Literature DB >> 33550436

Predictive factors for simultaneous distant metastasis in head and neck cancer patients during the diagnostic work-up.

Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba1, Maria Soriano-Reixach2, Ekhiñe Larruscain-Sarasola2, Jon Alexander Sistiaga-Suarez2, Jose Angel González-García2, Amaia Sanchez-Martin2, Laura Basterretxea-Badiola2, Naiara Sagastibelta2, Xabier Altuna-Mariezcurrena2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of distant metastasis (DM) in patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is relatively low, and multiple risk factors were described for the development of distant metastasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with a HNSCC between July 2016 and July 2020 in a tertiary university hospital.
RESULTS: Five-Hundred and sixty-nine patients meet inclusion criteria. In the univariate analysis we found a statistical correlation in those patients affected by a hypopharyngeal tumour (p = < 0.0001), patients older than 60 years old (p = 0.01), advanced T stage (p = < 0.0001), a proven positive lymph node (p = 0.02), poorly differentiated tumour (p = < 0.0001), patients with 3 or more positive lymph nodes (p = 0.0001), with ECS (p = 0.0001) and a second primary tumour (p = 0.03). However, according to those results from our multivariable analysis, the factor related to an increased or higher chance to detect a DM during the diagnosis work-up were the presence of a hypopharyngeal primary tumor with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.14, p =  < 0.0001, advanced T stage (T3-T4) with a HR of 1.21, p = 0.001, poorly differentiated tumor with a HR of 1.04, p =  < 0.0001, have proven positive lymph node with a HR of 1.03, p = 0.04, have more than three positive lymph node metastases with a HR of 1.25, p = 0.003, the presence of ECS with a HR of 1.40, p = 0.002, and have a second primary tumor with a HR of 1.05, p = 0.01.
CONCLUSION: According to the present study, factors such as hypopharyngeal tumours, advanced T-stage, poor differentiation grade, have more than three positive lymph nodes, ECS and have a second primary tumour should be considered as high-risk indicators for screening. Based on these results, the authors recommend considered an extensive diagnostic work-up in all patients with a high risk of DM development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Distant; Head; Metastasis; Neck

Year:  2021        PMID: 33550436     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06678-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  36 in total

1.  Development of distant metastasis after treatment of advanced-stage head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Alvi; J T Johnson
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Radiologic extranodal spread and matted nodes: Important predictive factors for development of distant metastases in patients with high-risk head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Redina Ljumanovic; Marieke J Hazewinkel; Birgit I Witte; Jonas A Castelijns
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Clinicopathologic analysis and predictive factors for distant metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Andrés Coca-Pelaz; Juan P Rodrigo; Carlos Suárez
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 4.  Incidence and sites of distant metastases from head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Ferlito; A R Shaha; C E Silver; A Rinaldo; V Mondin
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Distant metastases from carcinoma of the larynx.

Authors:  A L Abramson; S C Parisier; M J Zamansky; M Sulka
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  R de Bree; E E Deurloo; G B Snow; C R Leemans
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Distant metastases in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Fréderic Duprez; Dieter Berwouts; Wilfried De Neve; Katrien Bonte; Tom Boterberg; Philippe Deron; Wouter Huvenne; Sylvie Rottey; Marc Mareel
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Risk factors for distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Werner Garavello; Alberto Ciardo; Roberto Spreafico; Renato Maria Gaini
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-07

Review 9.  Detection of Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer: Changing Landscape.

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Asaf Senft; Andrés Coca-Pelaz; Luiz Kowalski; Fernando Lopez; William Mendenhall; Miquel Quer; Alessandra Rinaldo; Ashok R Shaha; Primož Strojan; Robert P Takes; Carl E Silver; C René Leemans; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Distant metastases in head and neck epidermoid carcinoma.

Authors:  M L Dennington; D R Carter; A D Meyers
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitative parameters derived from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging can accurately estimate the histologic grade of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma preoperatively.

Authors:  Zhaoting Meng; Lingyu Zhang; Caiyun Huang; Yingshi Piao; Xiaohong Chen; Junfang Xian
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.995

Review 2.  Patients with Pulmonary Metastases from Head and Neck Cancer Benefit from Pulmonary Metastasectomy, A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georg Schlachtenberger; Fabian Doerr; Hruy Menghesha; Patrick Lauinger; Philipp Wolber; Anton Sabashnikov; Aron-Frederik Popov; Sascha Macherey-Meyer; Gerardus Bennink; Jens P Klussmann; Thorsten Wahlers; Khosro Hekmat; Mathias B Heldwein
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.