PURPOSE: EF5, a 2-nitroimidazole hypoxia marker, was used to study the presence, levels, and prognostic significance of hypoxia in primary head and neck squamous cell tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients with newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx with at least 2 years of clinical follow-up were included in this study. Quantitative analyses of EF5 immunofluorescence was carried out, and these data were compared with patient outcome. RESULTS: EF5 immunostaining showed substantial intra- and intertumoral hypoxic heterogeneity. The majority of cells in all tumors were well oxygenated. Three patterns of EF5 binding in cells were identified using criteria based on the cellular region that was stained (peripheral or central) and the relationship of binding to necrosis. We tested the association between EF5-binding levels with event-free and overall survival irrespective of the pattern of cellular binding or treatment regimen. Patients with tumors containing EF5-binding regions corresponding to severe hypoxia (< or =0.1% oxygen) had a shorter event-free survival time than patients with pO(2) values greater than 0.1% (p = 0.032). Nodal status was also predictive for outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate the potential utility of EF5 binding based on quantitative immunohistochemistry of tissue pO(2) and provide support for the development of noninvasive hypoxia positron emission tomographic studies with fluorine 18-labeled EF5.
PURPOSE: EF5, a 2-nitroimidazolehypoxia marker, was used to study the presence, levels, and prognostic significance of hypoxia in primary head and neck squamous cell tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients with newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx with at least 2 years of clinical follow-up were included in this study. Quantitative analyses of EF5 immunofluorescence was carried out, and these data were compared with patient outcome. RESULTS: EF5 immunostaining showed substantial intra- and intertumoral hypoxic heterogeneity. The majority of cells in all tumors were well oxygenated. Three patterns of EF5 binding in cells were identified using criteria based on the cellular region that was stained (peripheral or central) and the relationship of binding to necrosis. We tested the association between EF5-binding levels with event-free and overall survival irrespective of the pattern of cellular binding or treatment regimen. Patients with tumors containing EF5-binding regions corresponding to severe hypoxia (< or =0.1% oxygen) had a shorter event-free survival time than patients with pO(2) values greater than 0.1% (p = 0.032). Nodal status was also predictive for outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate the potential utility of EF5 binding based on quantitative immunohistochemistry of tissue pO(2) and provide support for the development of noninvasive hypoxia positron emission tomographic studies with fluorine 18-labeled EF5.
Authors: Ilse J Hoogsteen; Wenny J M Peeters; Henri A M Marres; Paul F J W Rijken; Franciscus J A van den Hoogen; Albert J van der Kogel; Johannes H A M Kaanders Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Sydney M Evans; Kevin D Judy; Isolde Dunphy; W Timothy Jenkins; Wei-Ting Hwang; Peter T Nelson; Robert A Lustig; Kevin Jenkins; Deirdre P Magarelli; Stephen M Hahn; Ruth A Collins; M Sean Grady; Cameron J Koch Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A W Fyles; M Milosevic; R Wong; M C Kavanagh; M Pintilie; A Sun; W Chapman; W Levin; L Manchul; T J Keane; R P Hill Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Sydney M Evans; Kevin D Judy; Isolde Dunphy; W Timothy Jenkins; Peter T Nelson; Ruth Collins; E Paul Wileyto; Kevin Jenkins; Stephen M Hahn; Craig W Stevens; Alexander R Judkins; Peter Phillips; Birgit Geoerger; Cameron J Koch Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: D M Brizel; M E Albers; S R Fisher; R L Scher; W J Richtsmeier; V Hars; S L George; A T Huang; L R Prosnitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-06-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yoshihiro Azuma; Shu-Chuan Chou; Ruth A Lininger; Brian J Murphy; Mahesh A Varia; James A Raleigh Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Chang-Lung Lee; Everett J Moding; Kyle C Cuneo; Yifan Li; Julie M Sullivan; Lan Mao; Iman Washington; Laura B Jeffords; Rafaela C Rodrigues; Yan Ma; Shiva Das; Christopher D Kontos; Yongbaek Kim; Howard A Rockman; David G Kirsch Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: N Fujima; D Yoshida; T Sakashita; A Homma; A Tsukahara; K K Tha; K Kudo; H Shirato Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: John D Martin; Dai Fukumura; Dan G Duda; Yves Boucher; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Saskia E Rademakers; Paul N Span; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Fred C G J Sweep; Albert J van der Kogel; Johan Bussink Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 6.603