Literature DB >> 16828516

A symptom survey and quality of life questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children.

Jonathan M Holmes1, David A Leske, Stephen R Cole, Danielle L Chandler, Michael X Repka, David I Silbert, David Robbins Tien, Elizabeth A Bradley, Nicholas A Sala, Erika M Levin, Darren L Hoover, Deborah L Klimek, Brian G Mohney, Daniel M Laby, Katherine A Lee, Robert W Enzenauer, Darron A Bacal, Monte D Mills, Roy W Beck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a new parental questionnaire addressing symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in childhood nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Children ages 6 to younger than 48 months with and without clinical signs of NLDO.
METHODS: A new questionnaire was developed using semistructured interviews with parents of children with NLDO and through discussions with expert clinicians. Questionnaires were completed by parents of children with and without NLDO. Cronbach's alpha was calculated as a measure of internal-consistency reliability. Factor analysis was used to evaluate a priori subscales: symptoms and HRQL. Discriminant construct validity was assessed by comparing questionnaire scores between children with and without NLDO and between affected and unaffected eyes of children with unilateral NLDO. Instrument responsiveness was determined by comparing presurgical and postsurgical intervention scores in a subset of NLDO patients who underwent surgical treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The NLDO questionnaire score.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven children were enrolled, 56 with and 31 without NLDO. All but 2 questions on the questionnaire showed a good distribution of responses, a high correlation with the rest of the questionnaire, and excellent discrimination between patients with and without NLDO. Cronbach's alpha values were good for the overall questionnaire (0.95), and for 2 predetermined subscales: symptoms (0.95) and HRQL (0.85). On a 0 to 4 scale, NLDO patients had worse scores compared with non-NLDO patients for both symptoms (mean difference, 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-2.3) and HRQL (mean difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5) subscales. The NLDO patients had worse scores before intervention compared with after intervention for both the symptoms (mean difference, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-2.9) and HRQL (mean difference, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.8-2.1) subscales. Finally, NLDO patients had worse symptom scores for affected eyes compared with unaffected eyes (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.9-2.6).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel NLDO questionnaire is useful in quantifying parental perception of symptoms and HRQL in childhood NLDO. The questionnaire may have a role in future clinical studies of NLDO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16828516      PMCID: PMC2440590          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  19 in total

1.  Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora.

Authors:  C J MacEwen; J D Young; C W Barras; B Ram; P S White
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of balloon dacryocystoplasty to probing as the primary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  K B Gunton; C W Chung; B M Schnall; D Prieto; A Wexler; H P Koller
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Cronbach's alpha.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-22

4.  Naso-lacrimal duct balloon dilatation: medium to long term follow-up.

Authors:  K M McCullough
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Success of simple probing and irrigation in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction and otitis media.

Authors:  Dave H Lee; Scott J Fudemberg; Bradley V Davitt; Oscar A Cruz
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Long-term results after probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  S M Sturrock; C J MacEwen; J D Young
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Fluorescein transit test time and symptomatic outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Yvonne M Delaney; Ramona Khooshabeh
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.746

8.  Efficacy of probing as treatment of epiphora in adults with blocked nasolacrimal ducts.

Authors:  A Guinot-Saera; P Koay
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Balloon catheter dilatation for treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  B B Becker; F D Berry; H Koller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Follow-up after probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  S J Burns; A Kipioti
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  9 in total

1.  Measuring quality of life in oculoplastic patients.

Authors:  Edward Ridyard; Clare Inkster
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Development of Pediatric Eye Questionnaires for Children With Eye Conditions.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Yolanda S Castañeda; Suzanne M Wernimont; Laura Liebermann; Christina S Cheng-Patel; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Comparison of Rating Scales in the Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Children with Eye Disorders.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Suzanne M Wernimont; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2017-02-06

4.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with probing in children younger than 4 years.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Danielle L Chandler; Roy W Beck; Eric R Crouch; Sean Donahue; Jonathan M Holmes; Katherine Lee; Michele Melia; Graham E Quinn; Nick A Sala; Susan Schloff; David I Silbert; David K Wallace
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with balloon catheter dilation in children younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; B Michele Melia; Roy W Beck; Danielle L Chandler; Deborah R Fishman; Todd A Goldblum; Jonathan M Holmes; Bernard D Perla; Graham E Quinn; David I Silbert; David K Wallace
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; B Michele Melia; Roy W Beck; C Scott Atkinson; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Alexander Khammar; David Morrison; Graham E Quinn; David I Silbert; Benjamin H Ticho; David K Wallace; David R Weakley
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Symptom based diagnosis of infant under one year in outpatient clinic.

Authors:  Sangyoun Han; Ungsoo Samuel Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-19

8.  Impact of epiphora on vision-related quality of life.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Shin; Yoon-Duck Kim; Kyung In Woo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy as treatment for lower lacrimal pathway obstructions in adults: Review article.

Authors:  Elina Penttilä; Grigori Smirnov; Henri Tuomilehto; Kai Kaarniranta; Juha Seppä
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2015-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.