Literature DB >> 9640186

Efficacy of probing as treatment of epiphora in adults with blocked nasolacrimal ducts.

A Guinot-Saera1, P Koay.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the efficacy of probing in the initial treatment of epiphora and the symptom free period in adults with blocked nasolacrimal ducts.
METHODS: The results of probing in 85 eyes with epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct obstruction were studied retrospectively after a mean follow up of 7.4 months (SD 11.6) by a questionnaire and interview survey of patients.
RESULTS: 35% of the eyes had an outcome of no watering after probing, 17% mild watering, 35% moderate watering, and 11% severe watering. The patients' satisfaction (watering subjectively improved) after undergoing this procedure was 82%, which is higher than previously reported. The mean symptom free period in eyes with no watering was 11.25 months, in eyes with mild watering 8.20 months, in eyes with moderate watering 5.35 months, and in eyes with severe watering 0.95 months. There was a significant difference (p = 0.001) in the symptom free period between the no watering and severe watering groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Probing in adults with confirmed nasolacrimal duct obstruction can be recommended as an initial treatment procedure because of its relatively good efficacy and high patient satisfaction without compromising subsequent surgical treatment if unsuccessful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9640186      PMCID: PMC1722544          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.4.389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  21 in total

Review 1.  Acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction: an etiologic classification system, case reports, and a review of the literature. Part 1.

Authors:  G B Bartley
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  The investigation of epiphora.

Authors:  J J Hurwitz; P R Cooper; D L McRae; D R Chenoweith
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  Orbital hemorrhage during dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  J J Hurwitz; C J Eplett; D Fliss; J L Freeman
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  An unusual complication of nasolacrimal duct probing.

Authors:  R P Yeatts; B Crum
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1989-07

5.  An investigation into the efficacy of probing the nasolacrimal duct as a treatment for epiphora in adults.

Authors:  T A Bell
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1986

6.  [Endonasal microsurgical treatment of lacrimal duct stenoses. Indications, technique and results].

Authors:  R Weber; W Draf; P Kolb
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Carcinoma of the lacrimal sac].

Authors:  A Stefănescu-Dima; I Petria; S Crăiţoiu
Journal:  Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Oftalmol       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep

8.  Complications of malpositioned Jones tubes.

Authors:  G B Bartley; R O Gustafson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-01-15       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Pyogenic granulomas of the lacrimal sac.

Authors:  M N Asiyo; F H Stefani
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Treatment of recurrent nasolacrimal duct obstructions with balloon-expandable metallic stents: results of early experience.

Authors:  E T Ilgit; D Yüksel; M Unal; S Akpek; S Isik
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  5 in total

1.  A symptom survey and quality of life questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; David A Leske; Stephen R Cole; Danielle L Chandler; Michael X Repka; David I Silbert; David Robbins Tien; Elizabeth A Bradley; Nicholas A Sala; Erika M Levin; Darren L Hoover; Deborah L Klimek; Brian G Mohney; Daniel M Laby; Katherine A Lee; Robert W Enzenauer; Darron A Bacal; Monte D Mills; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Optimizing clinical outcomes for endoscopic lacrimal duct recanalization in patients with complete PANDO.

Authors:  Reynaldo M Javate
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Nasolacrimal duct recanalization with endodiathermy bipolar probe: response from authors.

Authors:  Siddharth Agrawal; Sanjiv K Gupta; Vinita Singh; Saurabh Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Evaluation of lacrimal duct probing in adults with 0.02% and 0.04% mitomycin-C in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: A randomized comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Manu Saini; Mandeep Singh Bajaj; Neelam Pushker; Rachna Meel; Kulbhushan Saini; Shweta Chaurasia; Aditi Mehta
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-02

5.  Combined Lacrimal Passage Probing and Tobramycin/Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Ointment Infiltration: A Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure for Incomplete Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.

Authors:  Jianjiang Xu; Jiaxu Hong; Xinghuai Sun; Zuguo Liu; Alireza Mashaghi; Takenori Inomata; Yi Lu; Yimin Li; Dan Wu; Yujing Yang; Anji Wei; Yujin Zhao; Chun Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.