Literature DB >> 28144812

Clinical validity of Metroticket calculator in transplant patients undergoing prior chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hyung-Don Kim1, Gi-Won Song2, Ju Hyun Shim3, Seungbong Han4, Jihyun An5, Deok-Bog Moon2, Kang Mo Kim5, Young-Suk Lim5, Gi-Young Ko6, Shin Hwang2, Han Chu Lee5, Eunsil Yu7, Kyu-Bo Sung6, Sung-Gyu Lee2.   

Abstract

AIM: To test the predictive performance of the Metroticket calculator for survival after liver transplantation (LT) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing prior transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
METHODS: A total of 142 patients treated with TACE and subsequent LT who had arterial enhancing HCC(s) were entered into this analysis. Tumor parameters measured by the enhancement radiological method pre-LT or by pathology post-LT were incorporated into the Metroticket analysis. The calculator was validated in terms of calibration and discrimination capacity.
RESULTS: Mean 3- and 5-year survival rates predicted in the radiological model for all 142 patients were 76.4 and 70.1 %, respectively, lying comfortably within the 95 % confidence interval (CI) of the observed survival rate estimates (72.8-86.2 and 68.6-83.2 %, respectively). In the pathological model incorporating microvascular invasion, the mean anticipated survival rate at 5 years of 120 patients with viable nodules on explants was 69.5 %, also lying inside the 95 % CI of the actuarial rates (67.9-83.5 %). The c-indices as measures of discriminatory power were 0.61 and 0.62, respectively, for the 3- and 5-year predictions in the radiological model, and 0.72 for the 5-year prediction in the pathological model. The corresponding findings were similar for subgroups with hepatitis B virus infection and undergoing living-donor LT.
CONCLUSIONS: The Metroticket calculation based on explant data accurately predicts post-LT survival of HCC patients with prior TACE. Imaging estimate-based predictions before LT appear to provide poorer discrimination than calibration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver transplantation; Metroticket calculator; Transarterial chemoembolization; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28144812     DOI: 10.1007/s12072-017-9785-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Int        ISSN: 1936-0533            Impact factor:   6.047


  30 in total

1.  Lessons learned from 1,000 living donor liver transplantations in a single center: how to make living donations safe.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Sung-Gyu Lee; Young-Joo Lee; Kyu-Bo Sung; Kwang-Min Park; Ki-Hun Kim; Chul-Soo Ahn; Deok-Bog Moon; Gyu-Sam Hwang; Kyung-Mo Kim; Tae-Yong Ha; Dong-Sik Kim; Jae-Pil Jung; Gi-Won Song
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Living-donor liver transplantation associated with higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence than deceased-donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Min-Su Park; Kwang-Woong Lee; Suk-Won Suh; Tae You; Youngrok Choi; Hyeyoung Kim; Geun Hong; Nam-Joon Yi; Choon-Hyuck David Kwon; Jae-Won Joh; Suk-Koo Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Response to transarterial chemoembolization as a biological selection criterion for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gerd Otto; Sascha Herber; Michael Heise; Ansgar W Lohse; Christian Mönch; Fernando Bittinger; Maria Hoppe-Lotichius; Marcus Schuchmann; Anja Victor; Michael Pitton
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: CT for tumor response after transarterial chemoembolization in patients exceeding Milan criteria--selection parameter for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Irene Bargellini; Claudio Vignali; Roberto Cioni; Pasquale Petruzzi; Antonio Cicorelli; Daniela Campani; Paolo De Simone; Franco Filipponi; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Cost effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma during the waiting list for liver transplantation.

Authors:  J M Llovet; X Mas; J J Aponte; J Fuster; M Navasa; E Christensen; J Rodés; J Bruix
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional therapies for patients in the waiting list. Impact on transplantability and recurrence rate.

Authors:  Matteo Cescon; Alessandro Cucchetti; Matteo Ravaioli; Antonio Daniele Pinna
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β is a novel prognostic marker independent of the Milan criteria in transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis based on tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Ju Hyun Shim; Han Chu Lee; Seungbong Han; Hyo Jeong Kang; Eunsil Yu; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Excellent outcome following down-staging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation: an intention-to-treat analysis.

Authors:  Francis Y Yao; Robert K Kerlan; Ryutaro Hirose; Timothy J Davern; Nathan M Bass; Sandy Feng; Marion Peters; Norah Terrault; Chris E Freise; Nancy L Ascher; John P Roberts
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 17.425

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.