Literature DB >> 16825537

Anaphase inactivation of the spindle checkpoint.

William J Palframan1, Janet B Meehl, Sue L Jaspersen, Mark Winey, Andrew W Murray.   

Abstract

The spindle checkpoint delays cell cycle progression until microtubules attach each pair of sister chromosomes to opposite poles of the mitotic spindle. Following sister chromatid separation, however, the checkpoint ignores chromosomes whose kinetochores are attached to only one spindle pole, a state that activates the checkpoint prior to metaphase. We demonstrate that, in budding yeast, mutual inhibition between the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and Mps1, an essential component of the checkpoint, leads to sustained inactivation of the spindle checkpoint. Mps1 protein abundance decreases in anaphase, and Mps1 is a target of the APC. Furthermore, expression of Mps1 in anaphase, or repression of the APC in anaphase, reactivates the spindle checkpoint. This APC-Mps1 feedback circuit allows cells to irreversibly inactivate the checkpoint during anaphase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825537     DOI: 10.1126/science.1127205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  59 in total

1.  A brief history of error.

Authors:  Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Degradation of the human mitotic checkpoint kinase Mps1 is cell cycle-regulated by APC-cCdc20 and APC-cCdh1 ubiquitin ligases.

Authors:  Yongping Cui; Xiaolong Cheng; Ce Zhang; Yanyan Zhang; Shujing Li; Chuangui Wang; Thomas M Guadagno
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  APC16 is a conserved subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Monique van der Voet; Moniek van der Voet; Michael S Manak; Maria H J van Osch; Said M Naini; Andrea Brear; Ian X McLeod; Dirk M Hentschel; John R Yates; Sander van den Heuvel; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Cellular abundance of Mps1 and the role of its carboxyl terminal tail in substrate recruitment.

Authors:  Tingting Sun; Xiaomei Yang; Wei Wang; Xiaojuan Zhang; Quanbin Xu; Songcheng Zhu; Robert Kuchta; Guanjun Chen; Xuedong Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Mlp1 acts as a mitotic scaffold to spatially regulate spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  Colin P De Souza; Shahr B Hashmi; Tania Nayak; Berl Oakley; Stephen A Osmani
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Stefan Kemmler; Manuel Stach; Maria Knapp; Jennifer Ortiz; Jens Pfannstiel; Thomas Ruppert; Johannes Lechner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Overcoming inhibition in the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Vincent Vanoosthuyse; Kevin G Hardwick
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acm1: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Denis Ostapenko; Janet L Burton; Ruiwen Wang; Mark J Solomon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  The multiple layers of ubiquitin-dependent cell cycle control.

Authors:  Katherine Wickliffe; Adam Williamson; Lingyan Jin; Michael Rape
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.