Literature DB >> 19300438

Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.

Stefan Kemmler1, Manuel Stach, Maria Knapp, Jennifer Ortiz, Jens Pfannstiel, Thomas Ruppert, Johannes Lechner.   

Abstract

The protein kinase Mps1 is, among others, essential for the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). We found that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mps1 interacts physically with the N-terminal domain of Ndc80 (Ndc80(1-257)), a constituent of the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. Furthermore, Mps1 effectively phosphorylates Ndc80(1-257) in vitro and facilitates Ndc80 phosphorylation in vivo. Mutating 14 of the phosphorylation sites to alanine results in compromised checkpoint signalling upon nocodazole treatment of mutants. Mutating the identical sites to aspartate (to simulate constitutive phosphorylation) causes a metaphase arrest with wild-type-like bipolar kinetochore-microtubule attachment. This arrest is due to a constitutively active SAC and consequently the inviable aspartate mutant can be rescued by disrupting SAC signalling. Therefore, we conclude that a putative Mps1-dependent phosphorylation of Ndc80 is important for SAC activation at kinetochores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19300438      PMCID: PMC2683709          DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2009.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  38 in total

1.  Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast.

Authors:  G Goshima; M Yanagida
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2.

Authors:  Silvia Martin-Lluesma; Volker M Stucke; Erich A Nigg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex.

Authors:  Claudio Ciferri; Sebastiano Pasqualato; Emanuela Screpanti; Gianluca Varetti; Stefano Santaguida; Gabriel Dos Reis; Alessio Maiolica; Jessica Polka; Jennifer G De Luca; Peter De Wulf; Mogjiborahman Salek; Juri Rappsilber; Carolyn A Moores; Edward D Salmon; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p.

Authors:  Iain M Cheeseman; Scott Anderson; Miri Jwa; Erin M Green; Jung seog Kang; John R Yates; Clarence S M Chan; David G Drubin; Georjana Barnes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  S Biggins; A W Murray
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The mitotic spindle is required for loading of the DASH complex onto the kinetochore.

Authors:  Yumei Li; Jeff Bachant; Annette A Alcasabas; Yanchang Wang; Jun Qin; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Four new subunits of the Dam1-Duo1 complex reveal novel functions in sister kinetochore biorientation.

Authors:  Carsten Janke; Jennifer Ortíz; Tomoyuki U Tanaka; Johannes Lechner; Elmar Schiebel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka; Najma Rachidi; Carsten Janke; Gislene Pereira; Marta Galova; Elmar Schiebel; Michael J R Stark; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Role of the kinetochore protein Ndc10 in mitotic checkpoint activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Fraschini; A Beretta; G Lucchini; S Piatti
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  The yeast protein kinase Mps1p is required for assembly of the integral spindle pole body component Spc42p.

Authors:  Andrea R Castillo; Janet B Meehl; Garry Morgan; Amy Schutz-Geschwender; Mark Winey
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-02-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  98 in total

1.  MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components.

Authors:  Yuya Yamagishi; Ching-Hui Yang; Yuji Tanno; Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Centromere-tethered Mps1 pombe homolog (Mph1) kinase is a sufficient marker for recruitment of the spindle checkpoint protein Bub1, but not Mad1.

Authors:  Daisuke Ito; Yu Saito; Tomohiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells.

Authors:  Reto Gassmann; Andrew J Holland; Dileep Varma; Xiaohu Wan; Filiz Civril; Don W Cleveland; Karen Oegema; Edward D Salmon; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface.

Authors:  Julie P I Welburn; Mathijs Vleugel; Dan Liu; John R Yates; Michael A Lampson; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Iain M Cheeseman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Overcoming inhibition in the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Vincent Vanoosthuyse; Kevin G Hardwick
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Stu1 inversely regulates kinetochore capture and spindle stability.

Authors:  Jennifer Ortiz; Caroline Funk; Astrid Schäfer; Johannes Lechner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 10.  Linked in: formation and regulation of microtubule attachments during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Dhanya K Cheerambathur; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 8.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.