Literature DB >> 16823619

The impact of genomic alterations on the transcriptome: a prostate cancer cell line case study.

J Chaudhary1, M Schmidt.   

Abstract

Genetic instability may lead to the loss/gain of transcriptional control. Here we investigated the effect of genomic instability, that is loss/gain of chromosomal regions on the global transcriptome of prostate cancer cell line DU145. The genomic loss/gain map obtained through BAC array-based CGH was superimposed on the dynamic transcriptome of DU145 cells treated with serum for 0 h (serum starved), 2 h and 12 h. The genomic analysis suggested that in DU145 cells: (1) chromosomal gains are prominent than losses and (2) copy number changes are associated with chromosome-specific and dynamic gene expression regulatory mechanisms. A significant proportion of the genes in the stable regions of the chromosome were up-regulated whereas a higher proportion of genes were down-regulated at 2 and 12 h in the deleted regions of the chromosomes following serum treatment. No change in expression was observed for the genes in the gained regions over a period of time. This analysis led us to propose that loss of heterozygosity leads to an overall transcriptional down-regulation that may further lead to a decrease in the expression of putative tumor suppressors. The genomic profile of DU145 is similar to pathological specimens of prostate cancer, hence the genomic/transcriptomic signature of DU145 can be used to understand the pathology of prostate cancer. It is expected that this analysis will allow a better understanding of transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in the context of genomic loss and gain and may lead to the discovery of novel oncogenes and tumor suppressors and the underlying regulatory pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16823619     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-006-1055-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  65 in total

1.  Expression imbalance map: a new visualization method for detection of mRNA expression imbalance regions.

Authors:  Makoto Kano; Kunihiro Nishimura; Shumpei Ishikawa; Shuichi Tsutsumi; Koichi Hirota; Michitaka Hirose; Hiroyuki Aburatani
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Predisposing gene for early-onset prostate cancer, localized on chromosome 1q42.2-43.

Authors:  P Berthon; A Valeri; A Cohen-Akenine; E Drelon; T Paiss; G Wöhr; A Latil; P Millasseau; I Mellah; N Cohen; H Blanché; C Bellané-Chantelot; F Demenais; P Teillac; A Le Duc; R de Petriconi; R Hautmann; I Chumakov; L Bachner; N J Maitland; R Lidereau; W Vogel; G Fournier; P Mangin; O Cussenot
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Comparative genomic hybridization as a tool in tumour cytogenetics.

Authors:  L A James
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 4.  Cancer: the evolved consequence of a destabilized genome.

Authors:  G R Anderson; D L Stoler; B M Brenner
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations in colorectal cancer by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Kentaro Nakao; Kshama R Mehta; Jane Fridlyand; Dan H Moore; Ajay N Jain; Amalia Lafuente; John W Wiencke; Jonathan P Terdiman; Frederic M Waldman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Allelic imbalance at 1p36 in the pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Katsumi Koshikawa; Shuji Nomoto; Katsuya Yamashita; Kiyoshi Ishigure; Shin Takeda; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Chromosomal deletions and tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Dong
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.

Authors:  D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Comprehensive genome-wide comparison of DNA and RNA level scan using microarray technology for identification of candidate cancer-related genes in the HL-60 cell line.

Authors:  Celal Ulger; Gokce A Toruner; Mualla Alkan; Mansoor Mohammed; Shamsha Damani; Jason Kang; Anthony Galante; Hana Aviv; Patricia Soteropoulos; Peter P Tolias; Marvin N Schwalb; James J Dermody
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2003-11

10.  Parallel analysis of sporadic primary ovarian carcinomas by spectral karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, and expression microarrays.

Authors:  Jane Bayani; James D Brenton; Pascale F Macgregor; Ben Beheshti; Monique Albert; Dhani Nallainathan; Jana Karaskova; Barry Rosen; Joan Murphy; Stephanie Laframboise; Brent Zanke; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  3 in total

1.  Integrative analysis reveals the direct and indirect interactions between DNA copy number aberrations and gene expression changes.

Authors:  Hyunju Lee; Sek Won Kong; Peter J Park
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Wavelet-based identification of DNA focal genomic aberrations from single nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Authors:  Youngmi Hur; Hyunju Lee
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Id1 and Id3 expression is associated with increasing grade of prostate cancer: Id3 preferentially regulates CDKN1B.

Authors:  Pankaj Sharma; Divya Patel; Jaideep Chaudhary
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.