Literature DB >> 15001537

High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations in colorectal cancer by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Kentaro Nakao1, Kshama R Mehta, Jane Fridlyand, Dan H Moore, Ajay N Jain, Amalia Lafuente, John W Wiencke, Jonathan P Terdiman, Frederic M Waldman.   

Abstract

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) allows for the simultaneous examination of thousands of genomic loci at 1-2 Mb resolution. Copy number alterations detected by array-based CGH can aid in the identification and localization of cancer causing genes. Here we report the results of array-based CGH in a set of 125 primary colorectal tumors hybridized onto an array consisting of 2463 bacterial artificial chromosome clones. On average, 17.3% of the entire genome was altered in our samples (8.5 +/- 6.7% gained and 8.8 +/- 7.3% lost). Losses involving 8p, 17p, 18p or 18q occurred in 37, 46, 49 and 60% of cases, respectively. Gains involving 8q or 20q were observed 42 and 65% of the time, respectively. A transition from loss to gain occurred on chromosome 8 between 41 and 48 Mb, with 25% of cases demonstrating a gain of 8p11 (45-53 Mb). Chromosome 8 also contained four distinct loci demonstrating high-level amplifications, centering at 44.9, 60, 92.7 and 144.7 Mb. On 20q multiple high-level amplifications were observed, centering at 32.3, 37.8, 45.4, 54.7, 59.4 and 65 Mb. Few differences in DNA copy number alterations were associated with tumor stage, location, age and sex of the patient. Microsatellite stable and unstable (MSI-H) tumors differed significantly with respect to the frequency of alterations (20 versus 5%, respectively, P < 0.01). Interestingly, MSI-H tumors were also observed to have DNA copy number alterations, most commonly involving 8q. This high-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations in colorectal cancer by array-based CGH allowed for the identification of many small, previously uncharacterized, genomic regions, such as on chromosomes 8 and 20. Array-based CGH was also able to identify DNA copy number changes in MSI-H tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15001537     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgh134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  72 in total

1.  Significance of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR-1) gene imbalances in colon and hepatocellular carcinomas based on tissue microarrays analysis.

Authors:  Evangelos Tsiambas; Stavros N Georgiannos; Nikolaos Salemis; Despoina Alexopoulou; Sofia Lambropoulou; Blerta Dimo; Ioannis Ioannidis; Christos Kravvaritis; Andreas Karameris; Efstratios Patsouris; Spyridon Dourakis
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Integrated genomic profiling identifies microRNA-92a regulation of IQGAP2 in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Raphael Pelossof; Oliver S Chow; Lauren Fairchild; J Joshua Smith; Manu Setty; Chin-Tung Chen; Zhenbin Chen; Fumiko Egawa; Karin Avila; Christina S Leslie; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  The impact of genomic alterations on the transcriptome: a prostate cancer cell line case study.

Authors:  J Chaudhary; M Schmidt
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Aneuploidy arises at early stages of Apc-driven intestinal tumorigenesis and pinpoints conserved chromosomal loci of allelic imbalance between mouse and human.

Authors:  Paola Alberici; Emma de Pater; Joana Cardoso; Mieke Bevelander; Lia Molenaar; Jos Jonkers; Riccardo Fodde
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  MSB: a mean-shift-based approach for the analysis of structural variation in the genome.

Authors:  Lu-Yong Wang; Alexej Abyzov; Jan O Korbel; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Quantifying the relative amount of mouse and human DNA in cancer xenografts using species-specific variation in gene length.

Authors:  Ming-Tseh Lin; Li-Hui Tseng; Hirohiko Kamiyama; Mihoko Kamiyama; Phillip Lim; Manuel Hidalgo; Sarah Wheelan; James Eshleman
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 7.  Genetic and clinical aspects of wood dust related intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma: a review.

Authors:  José Luis Llorente; Jhudit Pérez-Escuredo; César Alvarez-Marcos; Carlos Suárez; Mario Hermsen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  The candidate oncogene CYP24A1: A potential biomarker for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Henrik C Horváth; Péter Lakatos; János P Kósa; Krisztián Bácsi; Katalin Borka; Giovanna Bises; Thomas Nittke; Pamela A Hershberger; Gábor Speer; Enikö Kállay
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Copy number abnormalities in sporadic canine colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Jie Tang; Shoshona Le; Liang Sun; Xiuzhen Yan; Mucheng Zhang; Jennifer Macleod; Bruce Leroy; Nicole Northrup; Angela Ellis; Timothy J Yeatman; Yanchun Liang; Michael E Zwick; Shaying Zhao
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Normalized, segmented or called aCGH data?

Authors:  Wessel N van Wieringen; Mark A van de Wiel; Bauke Ylstra
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.