Literature DB >> 18263644

Integrative analysis reveals the direct and indirect interactions between DNA copy number aberrations and gene expression changes.

Hyunju Lee1, Sek Won Kong, Peter J Park.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs) and gene expression (GE) changes provide valuable information for studying chromosomal instability and its consequences in cancer. While it is clear that the structural aberrations and the transcript levels are intertwined, their relationship is more complex and subtle than initially suspected. Most studies so far have focused on how a CNA affects the expression levels of those genes contained within that CNA.
RESULTS: To better understand the impact of CNAs on expression, we investigated the correlation of each CNA to all other genes in the genome. The correlations are computed over multiple patients that have both expression and copy number measurements in brain, bladder and breast cancer data sets. We find that a CNA has a direct impact on the gene amplified or deleted, but it also has a broad, indirect impact elsewhere. To identify a set of CNAs that is coordinately associated with the expression changes of a set of genes, we used a biclustering algorithm on the correlation matrix. For each of the three cancer types examined, the aberrations in several loci are associated with cancer-type specific biological pathways that have been described in the literature: CNAs of chromosome (chr) 7p13 were significantly correlated with epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in glioblastoma multiforme, chr 13q with NF-kappaB cascades in bladder cancer, and chr 11p with Reck pathway in breast cancer. In all three data sets, gene sets related to cell cycle/division such as M phase, DNA replication and cell division were also associated with CNAs. Our results suggest that CNAs are both directly and indirectly correlated with changes in expression and that it is beneficial to examine the indirect effects of CNAs. AVAILABILITY: The code is available upon request.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18263644      PMCID: PMC2600603          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  54 in total

1.  Biclustering of expression data.

Authors:  Y Cheng; G M Church
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene.

Authors:  D G Albertson; B Ylstra; R Segraves; C Collins; S H Dairkee; D Kowbel; W L Kuo; J W Gray; D Pinkel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Robust estimators for expression analysis.

Authors:  Earl Hubbell; Wei-Min Liu; Rui Mei
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Impact of DNA amplification on gene expression patterns in breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hyman; Päivikki Kauraniemi; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Maija Wolf; Spyro Mousses; Ester Rozenblum; Markus Ringnér; Guido Sauter; Outi Monni; Abdel Elkahloun; Olli-P Kallioniemi; Anne Kallioniemi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors.

Authors:  Jonathan R Pollack; Therese Sørlie; Charles M Perou; Christian A Rees; Stefanie S Jeffrey; Per E Lonning; Robert Tibshirani; David Botstein; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs: a prognostic marker for good clinical outcome in human breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul N Span; C G J Sweep; Peggy Manders; Louk V A M Beex; David Leppert; Raija L P Lindberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Distinct domains in the SHP-2 phosphatase differentially regulate epidermal growth factor receptor/NF-kappaB activation through Gab1 in glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Gurpreet S Kapoor; Yi Zhan; Gibbes R Johnson; Donald M O'Rourke
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Aberrant promoter methylation and silencing of laminin-5-encoding genes in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Ubaradka G Sathyanarayana; Asha Padar; Chun Xian Huang; Makoto Suzuki; Hisayuki Shigematsu; B Nebiyou Bekele; Adi F Gazdar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  High-resolution analysis of chromosome rearrangements on 8p in breast, colon and pancreatic cancer reveals a complex pattern of loss, gain and translocation.

Authors:  J C M Pole; C Courtay-Cahen; M J Garcia; K A Blood; S L Cooke; A E Alsop; D M L Tse; C Caldas; P A W Edwards
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  32 in total

1.  Lessons from a decade of integrating cancer copy number alterations with gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Norman Huang; Parantu K Shah; Cheng Li
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  A comparative study of multi-omics integration tools for cancer driver gene identification and tumour subtyping.

Authors:  Anita Sathyanarayanan; Rohit Gupta; Erik W Thompson; Dale R Nyholt; Denis C Bauer; Shivashankar H Nagaraj
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Gene expression is highly correlated on the chromosome level in urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  George I Lambrou; Maria Adamaki; Dimitris Delakas; Demetrios A Spandidos; Spyros Vlahopoulos; Apostolos Zaravinos
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Using association signal annotations to boost similarity network fusion.

Authors:  Peifeng Ruan; Ya Wang; Ronglai Shen; Shuang Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Comparative analysis of algorithms for integration of copy number and expression data.

Authors:  Riku Louhimo; Tatiana Lepikhova; Outi Monni; Sampsa Hautaniemi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Integrated analysis of DNA copy number and gene expression microarray data using gene sets.

Authors:  Renée X Menezes; Marten Boetzer; Melle Sieswerda; Gert-Jan B van Ommen; Judith M Boer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Contrasting cellular stress responses of Baikalian and Palearctic amphipods upon exposure to humic substances: environmental implications.

Authors:  Marina V Protopopova; Vasiliy V Pavlichenko; Ralph Menzel; Anke Putschew; Till Luckenbach; Christian E W Steinberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Integrative clustering of multiple genomic data types using a joint latent variable model with application to breast and lung cancer subtype analysis.

Authors:  Ronglai Shen; Adam B Olshen; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  A test for comparing two groups of samples when analyzing multiple omics profiles.

Authors:  Nimisha Chaturvedi; Jelle J Goeman; Judith M Boer; Wessel N van Wieringen; Renée X de Menezes
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Statistical methods for gene set co-expression analysis.

Authors:  YounJeong Choi; Christina Kendziorski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.