Literature DB >> 16823618

Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. II. The modes of orientation and segregation of a trivalent.

S Nokkala1, V G Kuznetsova, A Maryanska-Nadachowska, C Nokkala.   

Abstract

The modes of orientation and segregation of the sex chromosome trivalent X1X2Y in male meiosis of Cacopsylla mali (Psylloidea, Homoptera) were analysed. Males with an X1X2Y sex chromosome system coexist with males displaying a neo-XY system in populations of this species. The fusion chromosome resulting in the formation of a trivalent in meiosis originates from the fusion of an autosome with the neo-Y chromosome. In the majority of metaphase I cells (92.4%) the X1X2Y trivalent showed co-orientation; X1 and X2 chromosomes oriented towards one pole whereas the Y oriented towards the opposite pole. In the rest of the cells (7.6%) the trivalent with subterminal chiasmata was oriented parallel to the equatorial plane. From this orientation the trivalent produced triple chromatids joined together by undivided telomeric parts of chromosomes and hence by sister chromatid cohesion at anaphase I. In the majority of metaphase II cells the orientation of triple chromatids suggested the production of unbalanced gametes. However, in a small number of cells (1.7%) the trivalent showed co-orientation of X1X2 with Y. Both the first division and second division co-orientations, or 94.1% of divisions as a whole, were estimated to yield balanced gametes, containing either X1 and X2 chromosomes or Y chromosome. It was concluded that, since the triple chromatid contained undivided telomere regions at metaphase II, which divided at anaphase II, the orientation of the trivalent with its longitudinal axis parallel to the equatorial plane in metaphase I also represents co-orientation and results in pre-reduction. The existence of post-reductional behaviour of holocentric bivalents and multivalents is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16823618     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-006-1053-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  5 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome cohesion and segregation in mitosis and meiosis.

Authors:  F Uhlmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  Inverted meiosis and meiotic drive in mealybugs.

Authors:  Silvia Bongiorni; Paolo Fiorenzo; Daniela Pippoletti; Giorgio Prantera
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-04-17       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. I. Restriction of the number of chiasmata in bivalents.

Authors:  S Nokkala; V G Kuznetsova; A Maryanska-Nadachowska; C Nokkala
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 4.  Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways.

Authors:  S E Bickel; T L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Mitotic and meiotic chromosomes in Somatochlora metallica (Cordulidae, Odonata). The absence of localized centromeres and inverted meiosis.

Authors:  Seppo Nokkala; Annu Laukkanen; Christina Nokkala
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.271

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Versatility of multivalent orientation, inverted meiosis, and rescued fitness in holocentric chromosomal hybrids.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Vlad Dincă; Magne Friberg; Jindra Šíchová; Martin Olofsson; Roger Vila; František Marec; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Do holocentric chromosomes represent an evolutionary advantage? A study of paired analyses of diversification rates of lineages with holocentric chromosomes and their monocentric closest relatives.

Authors:  José Ignacio Márquez-Corro; Marcial Escudero; Modesto Luceño
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Cytogenetics of the true bug infraorder Cimicomorpha (Hemiptera, Heteroptera): a review.

Authors:  Valentina G Kuznetsova; Snejana M Grozeva; Seppo Nokkala; Christina Nokkala
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 1.546

4.  Karyotypes, B-chromosomes and meiotic abnormalities in 13 populations of Alebra albostriella and A. wahlbergi (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadellidae) from Greece.

Authors:  Valentina G Kuznetsova; Natalia V Golub; Dora Aguin-Pombo
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.800

5.  A new butterfly species from south Russia revealed through chromosomal and molecular analysis of the Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) damonides complex (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 1.800

6.  Meiotic chromosome analysis of the giant water bug, Lethocerus indicus.

Authors:  Wijit Wisoram; Pradit Saengthong; Lertluk Ngernsiri
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.