Literature DB >> 15505408

Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. I. Restriction of the number of chiasmata in bivalents.

S Nokkala1, V G Kuznetsova, A Maryanska-Nadachowska, C Nokkala.   

Abstract

The number of chiasmata in bivalents and the behaviour of chiasmata during the meiotic divisions were studied in Psylla foersteri (Psylloidea, Homoptera). Two chiasmata with a frequency of 97% and one or three chiasmata with frequencies of 2% and 0.9%, respectively, were observed in the largest bivalent in male meiosis. Meiosis was normal for the largest bivalents with one or two chiasmata, whereas bivalents with three chiasmata were not capable of completing anaphase I because of their inability to resolve the chiasma located in the middle. Consequently, the bivalent was seen as a laggard joining together two metaphase II daughter plates. Apparently, cells of this kind are eliminated. Inability to resolve the chiasma situated in the middle is attributed to the condensation process, which is unable to change the spatial orientation of successive chiasma loops in holocentric bivalents so that chiasma loops would be arranged perpendicular to each other at metaphase I. Thus they retain their parallel orientation from diplotene to metaphase I. Consequently, sister chromatid cohesion is exposed for release only in the outermost chiasmata but the chiasma in the middle continues to interlock the chromosomes in the bivalent. The elimination of the cells carrying bivalents with more than two chiasmata creates a strong selection against the formation of more than two chiasmata in holocentric bivalents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15505408     DOI: 10.1023/B:CHRO.0000045797.74375.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  6 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome cohesion and segregation in mitosis and meiosis.

Authors:  F Uhlmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 2.  A review of karyotype variation in jumping plant-lice (Psylloidea, Sternorrhyncha, Hemiptera) and checklist of chromosome numbers.

Authors:  Anna Maryańska-Nadachowska
Journal:  Folia Biol (Krakow)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.432

3.  Meiotic behaviour of holocentric chromosomes: orientation and segregation of autosomes in Triatoma infestans (Heteroptera).

Authors:  R Pérez; F Panzera; J Page; J A Suja; J S Rufas
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 4.  Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways.

Authors:  S E Bickel; T L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  A new approach to the auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera, Insecta) cytogenetics: chromosomes of the meadow spittlebug Philaenus spumarius (L.) examined using various chromosome banding techniques.

Authors:  Valentina G Kuznetsova; Anna Maryańska-Nadachowska; Seppo Nokkala
Journal:  Folia Biol (Krakow)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.432

6.  Mitotic and meiotic chromosomes in Somatochlora metallica (Cordulidae, Odonata). The absence of localized centromeres and inverted meiosis.

Authors:  Seppo Nokkala; Annu Laukkanen; Christina Nokkala
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.271

  6 in total
  16 in total

1.  Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. II. The modes of orientation and segregation of a trivalent.

Authors:  S Nokkala; V G Kuznetsova; A Maryanska-Nadachowska; C Nokkala
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Versatility of multivalent orientation, inverted meiosis, and rescued fitness in holocentric chromosomal hybrids.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Vlad Dincă; Magne Friberg; Jindra Šíchová; Martin Olofsson; Roger Vila; František Marec; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Do holocentric chromosomes represent an evolutionary advantage? A study of paired analyses of diversification rates of lineages with holocentric chromosomes and their monocentric closest relatives.

Authors:  José Ignacio Márquez-Corro; Marcial Escudero; Modesto Luceño
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Holocentric chromosomes: from tolerance to fragmentation to colonization of the land.

Authors:  František Zedek; Petr Bureš
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Telomere-specific non-LTR retrotransposons and telomere maintenance in the silkworm, Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Haruhiko Fujiwara; Mizuko Osanai; Takumi Matsumoto; Kenji K Kojima
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Karyotypes, B-chromosomes and meiotic abnormalities in 13 populations of Alebra albostriella and A. wahlbergi (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadellidae) from Greece.

Authors:  Valentina G Kuznetsova; Natalia V Golub; Dora Aguin-Pombo
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.800

7.  Alternative meiotic chromatid segregation in the holocentric plant Luzula elegans.

Authors:  Stefan Heckmann; Maja Jankowska; Veit Schubert; Katrin Kumke; Wei Ma; Andreas Houben
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Mediterranean species of the spittlebug genus Philaenus: modes of chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Anna Maryańska-Nadachowska; Valentina G Kuznetsova; Dorota Lachowska; Sakis Drosopoulos
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Karyotypes, male meiosis and comparative FISH mapping of 18S ribosomal DNA and telomeric (TTAGG) n repeat in eight species of true bugs (Hemiptera, Heteroptera).

Authors:  S Grozeva; V G Kuznetsova; B A Anokhin
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.800

Review 10.  Comparative cytogenetics of Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera, Homoptera): a review.

Authors:  Valentina Kuznetsova; Dora Aguin-Pombo
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.