Literature DB >> 16823579

The impact of susceptibility gradients on cartesian and spiral EPI for BOLD fMRI.

Ryan Sangill1, Mikkel Wallentin, Leif Østergaard, Peter Vestergaard-Poulsen.   

Abstract

High sensitivity to magnetic susceptibility changes and accurate localization of functional activations are key requisites for pulse sequences used for BOLD fMRI. This paper seeks to develop a framework for analysing the performance of various k-space sampling techniques in this respect, with special emphasis on spiral EPI (spiral) and cartesian EPI (EPI) and their performance under influence of induced field gradients (SFGs) and stochastic noise. A numerical method for calculating synthetic MR images is developed and used to simulate BOLD fMRI experiments using EPI and spirals. The data is then examined for activation using a pixel-wise t test. Nine subjects are scanned with both techniques while performing a motor task. SPM99 is used for analysing the experimental data. The simulated spirals provide generally higher t scores at low SFGs but lose more strength than EPI at higher SFGs, where EPI activation is offset from the true position. In the primary motor area spirals provide significantly higher t scores (P < 0.0002). In-plane variation of EPI is higher in phase-encoding direction than in frequency-encoding direction (P < 0.003). In the low SFG areas spirals provide stronger activation than EPI and less spatial variability. Thus, spirals are recommended for fMRI in motor area and language areas.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16823579     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-006-0033-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  21 in total

1.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; A Kastrup; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Spiral-in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts.

Authors:  G H Glover; C S Law
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Test-retest reproducibility of quantitative CBF measurements using FAIR perfusion MRI and acetazolamide challenge.

Authors:  Yi-Fen Yen; Aaron S Field; Eric M Martin; Narter Ari; Jonathan H Burdette; Dixon M Moody; Atsushi M Takahashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation.

Authors:  S Ogawa; T M Lee; A R Kay; D W Tank
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The gridding method for image reconstruction by Fourier transformation.

Authors:  H Schomberg; J Timmer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Spiral K-space MR imaging of cortical activation.

Authors:  D C Noll; J D Cohen; C H Meyer; W Schneider
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays.

Authors:  D K Sodickson; W J Manning
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  A comparison of fast MR scan techniques for cerebral activation studies at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Y Yang; G H Glover; P van Gelderen; A C Patel; V S Mattay; J A Frank; J H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Characterizing function-structure relationships in the human visual system with functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Ahmed T Toosy; Olga Ciccarelli; Geoff J M Parker; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; David H Miller; Alan J Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumors at ultrahigh field: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  William T C Yuh; Greg A Christoforidis; Regina Maria Koch; Steffen Sammet; Petra Schmalbrock; Ming Yang; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-04

2.  Spiral Perfusion Imaging With Consecutive Echoes (SPICE™) for the Simultaneous Mapping of DSC- and DCE-MRI Parameters in Brain Tumor Patients: Theory and Initial Feasibility.

Authors:  Eric S Paulson; Douglas E Prah; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.