Literature DB >> 9438438

A comparison of fast MR scan techniques for cerebral activation studies at 1.5 tesla.

Y Yang1, G H Glover, P van Gelderen, A C Patel, V S Mattay, J A Frank, J H Duyn.   

Abstract

To evaluate the sensitivity of fast, gradient-echo MR scan techniques in their ability to detect blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes in task activation studies, three dedicated fast scan techniques, each with whole-brain coverage, were compared during a 3-min finger tapping paradigm on nine normal volunteers on a clinical 1.5 T scanner. Multislice (2D) single-shot spiral, 3D spiral, and multislice (2D) single-shot EPI scan techniques were done with similar temporal and spatial resolutions on each of the volunteers in random order. After image registration and statistical analysis, the sensitivity to detect activation was evaluated for the techniques by calculating t scores and number of activated voxels in predetermined regions of interest, including the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex, the premotor region, the parietal region, the supplementary motor area, and the ipsilateral cerebellum. Baseline images acquired with the three techniques were qualitatively comparable and had a similar effective spatial resolution of around 5 x 5 x 5 mm3, as determined from autocorrelation analysis. The anatomical coverage was somewhat reduced (4 less slices per volume) with EPI at the identical temporal resolution of 1.76 s for all techniques. The use of multislice 2D spiral scan for motor cortex fMRI experiments provided for a superior overall temporal stability, and an increased sensitivity compared with multislice 2D EPI, and 3D spiral scan. The difference in sensitivity between multislice 2D spiral and EPI scans was small, in particular in the case of a ramp-sampled version of EPI. The difference in performance is attributed mainly to the difference in scan-to-scan stability.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9438438     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  8 in total

Review 1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging: imaging techniques and contrast mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Howseman; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  fMRI study comparing names versus pictures of objects.

Authors:  Andrei Sevostianov; Barry Horwitz; Vladimir Nechaev; Rihana Williams; Stephen Fromm; Allen R Braun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Spiral imaging in fMRI.

Authors:  Gary H Glover
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The impact of susceptibility gradients on cartesian and spiral EPI for BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Ryan Sangill; Mikkel Wallentin; Leif Østergaard; Peter Vestergaard-Poulsen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  TE-dependent spatial and spectral specificity of functional connectivity.

Authors:  Changwei W Wu; Hong Gu; Qihong Zou; Hanbing Lu; Elliot A Stein; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Static and dynamic characteristics of cerebral blood flow during the resting state.

Authors:  Qihong Zou; Changwei W Wu; Elliot A Stein; Yufeng Zang; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Ultrafast bold fMRI using single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging.

Authors:  Saïd Boujraf; Paul Summers; Faouzi Belahsen; Klaas Prüssmann; Spyros Kollias
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-01

8.  High-field FMRI for human applications: an overview of spatial resolution and signal specificity.

Authors:  Cheryl A Olman; Essa Yacoub
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2011-11-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.