Literature DB >> 9783547

Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study.

C E De Laet1, B A Van Hout, H Burger, A E Weel, A Hofman, H A Pols.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to validate a hip fracture risk function, composed of age and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). This estimate of the 1-year cumulative risk was previously developed on the basis of Dutch hip fracture incidence data and BMD in men and women. A cohort of 7046 persons (2778 men) aged 55 years and over was followed for an average of 3.8 years. The 1-year hip fracture risk estimate was calculated for each participant according to the risk function and categorized as low (<0.1%), moderate (0.1 to < 1%), or high (> or =1%). Observed first hip fracture incidence was then analyzed for each of these risk categories by age and gender. Additionally, we calculated the relative risk per standard deviation (SD) decrease in femoral neck BMD in this population. At baseline, 2360 individuals were categorized as low risk, 2567 as moderate risk, and 378 as high risk During follow-up, 110 first hip fractures were observed corresponding to an incidence rate of 4.1/1000 person-years (pyrs) (95% confidence interval 3.4-5.0). The observed incidence rate in the low risk group was 0.2/1000 pyrs (0.1-0.9), 2.7/1000 pyrs (1.8-3.9) in the moderate risk group, and 18.4/1000 pyrs (12.4-27.2) in the high risk group. Below the age of 70 years, incidence was low in all categories, and very few individuals were considered at high risk Above the age of 70 years, the observed incidence was high in the high risk group, while in the low and moderate risk groups, the incidence remained low even over 80 years of age. In women, the age-adjusted relative risk for hip fractures was 2.5 per SD decrease in femoral neck BMD (1.8-3.6), while in men this relative risk was 3.0 per SD (1.7-5.4). In conclusion, we observed a similar relation of hip fracture with femoral neck BMD in men and women and were able to predict accurately hip fracture rates over a period of almost 4 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9783547     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  80 in total

Review 1.  An update on the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  G M Prelevic
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The 2002 Canadian bone densitometry recommendations: take-home messages.

Authors:  Aliya A Khan; Jacques P Brown; David L Kendler; William D Leslie; Brian C Lentle; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; R Lawrence Nicholson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Bone Density Screening and Re-screening in Postmenopausal Women and Older Men.

Authors:  Margaret L Gourlay; Robert A Overman; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Validation of the Cummings' risk score; how well does it identify women with high risk of hip fracture: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Luai A Ahmed; Henrik Schirmer; Vinjar Fønnebø; Ragnar M Joakimsen; Gro K Berntsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  The perspective of the International Osteoporosis Foundation on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Ego Seeman; Olof Johnell; Rene Rizzoli; Pierre Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Treatment of low bone mass in premenopausal women: when may it be appropriate?

Authors:  Edward S Leib
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; F Borgstrom; N Zethraeus; C De Laet; B Jonsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Preservation of bone structure and function by Lithothamnion sp. derived minerals.

Authors:  Muhammad Nadeem Aslam; Ingrid Bergin; Karl Jepsen; Jaclynn M Kreider; Kristin H Graf; Madhav Naik; Steven A Goldstein; James Varani
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Sandro Giannini; Ruben Giorgino; GianCarlo Isaia; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Sinigaglia; Paolo Filipponi; Gaetano Crepaldi; Ombretta Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.