BACKGROUND: Suggestions for improved wear performance of total knee replacements have included replacement of standard CoCr femoral components with ceramic and replacement of 3.5-Mrad ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) inserts with 5- or 7-Mrad UHMWPE inserts. The ceramic materials used clinically have included alumina, zirconia ceramic and oxidized zirconium. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We compared both CoCr and zirconia versions of the Bi-Surface knee replacement in a 6-station knee simulator using alpha calf serum for lubrication (20 mg protein per mL) to evaluate the relative bearing performance. RESULTS: We studied the 4-way knee simulation of implant materials: zirconia ceramic, CoCr, 3.5-Mrad UHMWPE, and 7-Mrad UHMWPE. With CoCr femoral components, the 7-Mrad UHMWPE resulted in a 5- to 8-fold reduction in wear compared to the 3.5-Mrad insert. With the 3.5-Mrad insert, the zirconia bearing provided approximately 4-fold wear reduction compared to CoCr. These wear rates with standard UHMWPE were similar to published wear studies on entire knees. With the exception of the CoCr/7-Mrad and ZrO2/3.5-Mrad combinations, the wear differences were statistically significant. INTERPRETATION: The ZrO2/7-Mrad UHMWPE combination gave the best performance, with no measurable wear over the 5.5 million cycle test duration.
BACKGROUND: Suggestions for improved wear performance of total knee replacements have included replacement of standard CoCr femoral components with ceramic and replacement of 3.5-Mrad ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) inserts with 5- or 7-Mrad UHMWPE inserts. The ceramic materials used clinically have included alumina, zirconia ceramic and oxidized zirconium. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We compared both CoCr and zirconia versions of the Bi-Surface knee replacement in a 6-station knee simulator using alpha calf serum for lubrication (20 mg protein per mL) to evaluate the relative bearing performance. RESULTS: We studied the 4-way knee simulation of implant materials: zirconia ceramic, CoCr, 3.5-Mrad UHMWPE, and 7-Mrad UHMWPE. With CoCr femoral components, the 7-Mrad UHMWPE resulted in a 5- to 8-fold reduction in wear compared to the 3.5-Mrad insert. With the 3.5-Mrad insert, the zirconia bearing provided approximately 4-fold wear reduction compared to CoCr. These wear rates with standard UHMWPE were similar to published wear studies on entire knees. With the exception of the CoCr/7-Mrad and ZrO2/3.5-Mrad combinations, the wear differences were statistically significant. INTERPRETATION: The ZrO2/7-Mrad UHMWPE combination gave the best performance, with no measurable wear over the 5.5 million cycle test duration.
Authors: J P Kretzer; C Zietz; C Schröder; J Reinders; L Middelborg; A Paulus; R Sonntag; R Bader; S Utzschneider Journal: Orthopade Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.087
Authors: Christine J Frandsen; Kunbae Noh; Karla S Brammer; Gary Johnston; Sungho Jin Journal: Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 7.328