Literature DB >> 18157487

Patients' perspective on controversial issues in total knee arthroplasty.

Tae Kyun Kim1, Jinbae Choi, Kwang Sook Shin, Chong Bum Chang, Sang Cheol Seong.   

Abstract

We investigated the level of patient knowledge and preferences over the currently controversial issues in TKA. One hundred patients who had decided to undergo TKA for advanced osteoarthritis were asked to complete a questionnaire inquiring their knowledge and preferences over three controversial issues: (1) computer assisted surgery (CAS), (2) minimal invasive surgery (MIS), and (3) ceramic femoral component. The patient preferences over the three issues were questioned again after they had been informed of advantages and disadvantages of each option using an explanatory document. Most (more than 75%) of the patients did not have sufficient knowledge and their knowledge was based on non-professional sources (more than 85%). Before the information was given, most (more than 80%) of the patients preferred a new option. After the information was provided, more patients preferred a standard option in the issues of CAS (60%) and MIS (88%). This study prompts health care providers to become more active in providing accurate information and to consider patients perspective in making decisions which will influence the benefits and risk of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18157487     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0468-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation.

Authors:  J Y Jenny; C Boeri
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2001

2.  The validity of claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements.

Authors:  Timothy Bhattacharyya; Paul Tornetta; William L Healy; Thomas A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Nizard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.500

4.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

5.  Intraobserver errors in obtaining visually selected anatomic landmarks during registration process in nonimage-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric experiment.

Authors:  W P Yau; Anthony Leung; K Y Chiu; W M Tang; T P Ng
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Mini incision: occasionally desirable, rarely necessary: in the affirmative.

Authors:  Leo A Whiteside
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach.

Authors:  Steven B Haas; Mary Ann Manitta; Paul Burdick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  [Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies].

Authors:  H Bäthis; S Shafizadeh; T Paffrath; C Simanski; J Grifka; C Lüring
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use.

Authors:  Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Thomas M Coon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Modelling knee range of motion post arthroplasty: clinical applications.

Authors:  Paul W Stratford; Deborah M Kennedy; Susan F Robarts
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 2.  Does minimally invasive surgery improve short-term recovery in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Tao Liu; Guoyou Zhang; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Current role of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; M Flören; R Bieger; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  No difference in early functional outcomes for mini-midvastus and limited medial parapatellar approaches in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee; Jungsoon Choi; Kyung-Wook Nha; Ho-Joong Kim; Seung-Beom Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Recovery in knee range of motion reaches a plateau by 12 months after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhou; Khye Soon Andy Yew; Earnest Arul; Pak-Lin Chin; Keng Jin Darren Tay; Ngai-Nung Lo; Shi-Lu Chia; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.