Literature DB >> 16818188

Economic impact of screening for bladder cancer using bladder tumor markers: a decision analysis.

Robert S Svatek1, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Yair Lotan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Food and Drug Administration recently approved the use of bladder markers such as BladderChek (NMP22; Matritech, Inc., Newton, MA) and UroVysion (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) for use in screening for bladder cancer. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the cost associated with implementing a widespread screening program using a noninvasive bladder tumor marker.
METHODS: Data for the accuracy of NMP22 in detecting bladder cancer was gathered from a comprehensive literature review. A decision tree analysis was constructed to evaluate the total cost of screening a low and high-risk population for bladder cancer using NMP22. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the effect of relaxing the various assumptions in the model.
RESULTS: Application of the model to all men, regardless of the degree of risk, rendered a cost per cancer detected of $783,913, $269,028, and $139,305 for ages 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 years, respectively. Screening only patients at high-risk for bladder cancer (annual incidence 6%) would yield a cost per cancer detected of $3,310. Incidence of cancer and marker specificity had the highest influence on cost per cancer detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Application of NMP22 to the entire population would render an extremely high cost per cancer detected. However, application to an appropriate high-risk target population could achieve cost per cancer detected comparable to currently used screening programs for prostate, colon, and breast cancer. Further studies are needed to assess the accuracy of bladder tumor markers in detecting bladder cancer in a completely asymptomatic cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16818188     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  15 in total

1.  Mapping of the UGT1A locus identifies an uncommon coding variant that affects mRNA expression and protects from bladder cancer.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Yi-Ping Fu; Jonine D Figueroa; Núria Malats; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Manolis Kogevinas; Dalsu Baris; Michael Thun; Jennifer L Hall; Immaculata De Vivo; Demetrius Albanes; Patricia Porter-Gill; Mark P Purdue; Laurie Burdett; Luyang Liu; Amy Hutchinson; Timothy Myers; Adonina Tardón; Consol Serra; Alfredo Carrato; Reina Garcia-Closas; Josep Lloreta; Alison Johnson; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Alan Schned; Amanda Black; Eric J Jacobs; W Ryan Diver; Susan M Gapstur; Jarmo Virtamo; David J Hunter; Joseph F Fraumeni; Stephen J Chanock; Debra T Silverman; Nathaniel Rothman; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  A Festschrift in Honor of Edward M. Messing, MD, FACS.

Authors:  Jean V Joseph; Ralph Brasacchio; Chunkit Fung; Jay Reeder; Kevin Bylund; Deepak Sahasrabudhe; Shu Yuan Yeh; Ahmed Ghazi; Patrick Fultz; Deborah Rubens; Guan Wu; Eric Singer; Edward Schwarz; Supriya Mohile; James Mohler; Dan Theodorescu; Yi Fen Lee; Paul Okunieff; David McConkey; Hani Rashid; Chawnshang Chang; Yves Fradet; Khurshid Guru; Janet Kukreja; Gerald Sufrin; Yair Lotan; Howard Bailey; Katia Noyes; Seymour Schwartz; Kathy Rideout; Gennady Bratslavsky; Steven C Campbell; Ithaar Derweesh; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Mark Soloway; Leonard Gomella; Dragan Golijanin; Robert Svatek; Thomas Frye; Seth Lerner; Ganesh Palapattu; George Wilding; Michael Droller; Donald Trump
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2018-10-03

3.  Accounting for increased non-target-disease-specific mortality in decision-analytic screening models for economic evaluation.

Authors:  Björn Stollenwerk; Afschin Gandjour; Markus Lüngen; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-12-30

4.  External validation of a multiplex urinary protein panel for the detection of bladder cancer in a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Li-Mei Chen; Myron Chang; Yunfeng Dai; Karl X Chai; Lars Dyrskjøt; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Tibor Szarvas; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Vinata Lokeshwar; Carmen Jeronimo; Alexander S Parker; Shanti Ross; Michael Borre; Torben F Orntoft; Tobias Jaeger; Willemien Beukers; Luis E Lopez; Rui Henrique; Paul R Young; Virginia Urquidi; Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Urinary protein biomarker panel for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Rosser; Myron Chang; Yunfeng Dai; Shanti Ross; Lourdes Mengual; Antonio Alcaraz; Steve Goodison
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Critical evaluation of urinary markers for bladder cancer detection and monitoring.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Jose A Karam; Yair Lotan; Pierre I Karakiewizc
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 7.  Healthcare economics of bladder cancer: cost-enhancing and cost-reducing factors.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Eric A Singer; Edward M Messing
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 8.  The health economics of bladder cancer: an updated review of the published literature.

Authors:  Christina Yeung; Tuan Dinh; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Lorne I Budman; Wassim Kassouf; Jordan R Steinberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Screening for bladder cancer: a perspective.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Robert S Svatek; Núria Malats
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.