Literature DB >> 16816891

The "muscular hernia sign": an original ultrasonographic sign to detect lesions of the forearm's interosseous membrane.

Marc Soubeyrand1, Clarisse Lafont, Christophe Oberlin, Welby France, Ivan Maulat, Renaud Degeorges.   

Abstract

The total disruption of the forearm's interosseous membrane can lead to an Essex-Lopresti syndrome. The diagnosis must be done early for a better prognostic. Incomplete lesions can aggravate and an early diagnosis of incomplete lesions is a challenging problem. Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard but remains expensive, and is hard to obtain in an emergency. On the contrary, ultrasonography is cheap, accessible in an emergency, and dynamical tests can be performed easily. Twelve fresh frozen forearms were randomized in four groups. The membrane was divided into three parts (proximal, middle, and distal thirds). Each group was prepared with variable patterns of lesions. Two radiologists performed an ultrasonographic (US) examination of these forearms. They were blinded with respect to the lesional status of the forearms. Each examination consisted of two stages: static and dynamic. During the dynamic examination, the radiologist looked for the "muscular hernia sign". The results of their examinations were compared with the real lesional status. The static examination was very efficient in the proximal and middle parts of the membrane, and less reliable in the distal third. With the dynamical examination, no mistake occurred at the proximal and middle parts of the forearm, and there was only one at the distal part. The US examination of the interosseous membrane is very efficient to detect incomplete lesions, mostly, if dynamical tests are performed looking for a "muscular hernia sign".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16816891     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-006-0100-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  15 in total

1.  Ultrasonography for the evaluation of forearm interosseous membrane disruption in a cadaver model.

Authors:  J I Jaakkola; D H Riggans; G M Lourie; C J Lang; B T Elhassan; B El hassan; S J Rosenthal; B E Hassem
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting disruptions of the forearm interosseous membrane: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Eric W Fester; Peter M Murray; Timothy G Sanders; John V Ingari; John Leyendecker; Henry L Leis
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Dislocation of the inferior radio-ulnar joint.

Authors:  J F CURR; W A COE
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1946-07       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Ligamentoplasty of the forearm interosseous membrane using the semitendinosus tendon: anatomical study and surgical procedure.

Authors:  M Soubeyrand; C Oberlin; C Dumontier; Z Belkheyar; C Lafont; R Degeorges
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Fractures of the radial head with distal radio-ulnar dislocation; report of two cases.

Authors:  P ESSEX-LOPRESTI
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1951-05

6.  Symptomatic proximal translation of the radius following radial head resection.

Authors:  D T Sowa; R N Hotchkiss; A J Weiland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The interosseous membrane in radio-ulnar dissociation.

Authors:  A L Wallace; W R Walsh; M van Rooijen; J S Hughes; D H Sonnabend
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-05

8.  An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: pathomechanics of proximal migration of the radius.

Authors:  R N Hotchkiss; K N An; D T Sowa; S Basta; A J Weiland
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Ultrasound diagnosis and surgical pathology of the torn interosseous membrane in forearm fractures/dislocations.

Authors:  J M Failla; J Jacobson; M van Holsbeeck
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of the forearm.

Authors:  D W Starch; E J Dabezies
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the forearm interosseous membrane. A review.

Authors:  Juan Rodriguez-Martin; Juan Pretell-Mazzini
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Longitudinal instability of the forearm.

Authors:  J Phadnis; A C Watts
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Role of the interosseous membrane in post-traumatic forearm instability: instructional review.

Authors:  Uros Meglic; Noemi Szakacs; Margherita Menozzi; Raul Barco; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Alessandra Colozza
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of acute Essex-Lopresti injury: focus on terminology and review of literature.

Authors:  Maurizio Fontana; Marco Cavallo; Graziano Bettelli; Roberto Rotini
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Ligamentous reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in the treatment of instability of the distal radioulnar joint.

Authors:  Márcio Aurélio Aita; Ricardo Carvalho Mallozi; Willian Ozaki; Douglas Hideo Ikeuti; Daniel Alexandre Pereira Consoni; Gustavo Mantovanni Ruggiero
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2018-02-23

Review 6.  Essex-Lopresti injuries: an update.

Authors:  Panagiotis T Masouros; Emmanuel P Apergis; George C Babis; Stylianos S Pernientakis; Vasilios G Igoumenou; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Vasileios S Nikolaou
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-04-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.