Literature DB >> 12015715

The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting disruptions of the forearm interosseous membrane: a cadaver study.

Eric W Fester1, Peter M Murray, Timothy G Sanders, John V Ingari, John Leyendecker, Henry L Leis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) in determining complete disruptions of the central portion of the forearm interosseous membrane. The midportion of the forearm interosseous ligament was longitudinally incised in 19 fresh-frozen cadaver arms. The specimens were imaged with MRI and US. The MRIs were examined by a hand surgeon, a musculoskeletal radiologist, and a general radiologist, all blinded to the state of the interosseous membrane. The musculoskeletal radiologist and general radiologists read the real-time US images in a consensus fashion. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a 96% accuracy rate, a 100% positive predictive value, a 93% negative predictive value, 93% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. Kappa analysis showed substantial interobserver agreement for MRI. Ultrasound showed a 94% accuracy rate, a 94% positive predictive value, a 100% negative predictive value, 100% sensitivity, and 89% specificity. There was no statistical significance between the accuracy of MRI and US. We conclude that MRI and US imaging should both be considered when forearm interosseous membrane integrity is in question.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12015715     DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.32961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis and treatment of the Essex-Lopresti lesion. Literature review and four case reports].

Authors:  A Doser; M Markmiller; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The "muscular hernia sign": an original ultrasonographic sign to detect lesions of the forearm's interosseous membrane.

Authors:  Marc Soubeyrand; Clarisse Lafont; Christophe Oberlin; Welby France; Ivan Maulat; Renaud Degeorges
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Forearm interosseous membrane trauma: MRI diagnostic criteria and injury patterns.

Authors:  Joseph C McGinley; Neil Roach; Brendon C Hopgood; Karl Limmer; Scott H Kozin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Morphological evaluation of the distal interosseous membrane using ultrasound.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Okada; Hisao Moritomo; Junichi Miyake; Toshiyuki Kataoka; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Tsuyoshi Murase; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-12

Review 5.  The role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the forearm interosseous membrane. A review.

Authors:  Juan Rodriguez-Martin; Juan Pretell-Mazzini
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  MRI Correlation of Radial Head Fractures and Forearm Injuries.

Authors:  Hisham Awan; Robert Goitz
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-07-07

Review 7.  Longitudinal instability of the forearm.

Authors:  J Phadnis; A C Watts
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Management of the Essex-Lopresti Injury.

Authors:  Andrew P Matson; David S Ruch
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2016-06-20

9.  A historical perspective on the Essex-Lopresti injury.

Authors:  Evan P McGlinn; Sandeep J Sebastin; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  The Essex-Lopresti lesion.

Authors:  K Wegmann; J Dargel; K J Burkhart; G P Brüggemann; L P Müller
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2012-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.