OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors associated with the abacavir hypersensitivity reaction during primary HIV infection (PHI). DESIGN: Acute HIV Infection and Early Disease Research Program protocol (AIEDRP) AI-02-001 provided antiretroviral therapy including abacavir. This retrospective analysis evaluated variables potentially associated with hypersensitivity in the cohort enrolled in AI-02-001 at the University of Washington Primary Infection Clinic. METHODS: Cases of suspected hypersensitivity were identified prospectively and reviewed retrospectively using a standardized case definition. Controls were the remaining cohort without hypersensitivity. Univariate analyses were performed by linear logistic regression. RESULTS: Nine (18%) of 50 individuals treated with abacavir developed suspected hypersensitivity. Two of nine cases and no controls were HLA-B5701 positive. When antiretroviral medications were started, cases had lower mean CD8 T-cell percentage and plasma HIV RNA value. After 2 weeks on abacavir, cases had a lower mean HIV RNA value and a trend towards greater decrease in RNA. Cases began abacavir a median of 103 days after HIV acquisition compared to 48 days for controls. There was no significant in vitro abacavir-specific lymphoproliferation or IFN-gamma production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals following the suspected hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Abacavir use during PHI may be associated with increased risk of hypersensitivity. As in chronic infection, HLA-B5701 is associated with the abacavir hypersensitivity reaction in PHI. Although levels of CD8 T cells and HIV RNA may be risk factors for hypersensitivity, the observed association may be due to correlation with HLA-B5701. The interesting temporal association of hypersensitivity with initiation of abacavir later in PHI merits future investigation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors associated with the abacavirhypersensitivity reaction during primary HIV infection (PHI). DESIGN: Acute HIV Infection and Early Disease Research Program protocol (AIEDRP) AI-02-001 provided antiretroviral therapy including abacavir. This retrospective analysis evaluated variables potentially associated with hypersensitivity in the cohort enrolled in AI-02-001 at the University of Washington Primary Infection Clinic. METHODS: Cases of suspected hypersensitivity were identified prospectively and reviewed retrospectively using a standardized case definition. Controls were the remaining cohort without hypersensitivity. Univariate analyses were performed by linear logistic regression. RESULTS: Nine (18%) of 50 individuals treated with abacavir developed suspected hypersensitivity. Two of nine cases and no controls were HLA-B5701 positive. When antiretroviral medications were started, cases had lower mean CD8 T-cell percentage and plasma HIV RNA value. After 2 weeks on abacavir, cases had a lower mean HIV RNA value and a trend towards greater decrease in RNA. Cases began abacavir a median of 103 days after HIV acquisition compared to 48 days for controls. There was no significant in vitro abacavir-specific lymphoproliferation or IFN-gamma production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals following the suspected hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSIONS:Abacavir use during PHI may be associated with increased risk of hypersensitivity. As in chronic infection, HLA-B5701 is associated with the abacavirhypersensitivity reaction in PHI. Although levels of CD8 T cells and HIV RNA may be risk factors for hypersensitivity, the observed association may be due to correlation with HLA-B5701. The interesting temporal association of hypersensitivity with initiation of abacavir later in PHI merits future investigation.
Authors: Linda G Apuzzo; Florin Vaida; Joel E Gallant; Karin B Ernstrom; Susan J Little; Jean-Pierre Routy; Ann C Collier; Brian Conway; Martin H Markowitz; Frederick M Hecht; Bruce D Walker; Elizabeth Connick; Joseph B Margolick Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731