Literature DB >> 17638393

Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children.

Carlo Giaquinto1, Osvalda Rampon, Martina Penazzato, Federica Fregonese, Anita De Rossi, Ruggiero D'Elia.   

Abstract

By the end of 2006, approximately 2.3 million children worldwide were living with HIV infection, representing about 15% of all HIV-infected individuals but only 5-7% of the total population of treated patients worldwide. Despite a general increase in the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings, appropriate care and ART remain inaccessible for most of the world's HIV-infected children. ART of children is challenging because of a general lack of paediatric formulations (including tablets in paediatric strengths), limited options of drugs available for children (some have been approved only for use in adults), different viral and immunological responses, dependency on caregivers for administration of the therapy, and specific issues of toxicity in long-term therapy related to maturation and development. As in adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are a key component of any ART schedule in children, being the recommended 'backbone' treatment in US, European and WHO guidelines, and, indeed, NRTIs have been extensively studied in children. NRTIs are the class of antiretroviral drugs that have more drugs licensed for paediatric use and more paediatric formulations.Generally, the dual NRTI backbone treatment of combination with a non-NRTI (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) should comprise a cytidine analogue (lamivudine, emtricitabine) and a thymidine analogue (stavudine, zidovudine), guanosine analogue (i.e. abacavir), or nucleotide RTI (NtRTI; i.e. tenofovir). European and US guidelines recommend the use of triple NRTI therapy (abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine) in children with anticipated poor adherence to other treatment regimens because of tablet burden. In conclusion, while use of ART in children needs to be dramatically increased, selecting and administering the best drug combination for children is still limited by a lack of paediatric formulations and knowledge of drug metabolism, safety and efficacy in children. NRTIs are already a key component of paediatric ART, but fixed-dose combinations and specific research in children are needed to optimise their use. In this article we review the available information to facilitate selection of the best NRTI for backbone treatment in combination ART for HIV-infected children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638393     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200727080-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  113 in total

1.  Current evidence for the use of paediatric antiretroviral therapy--a PENTA analysis. Paediatric European Network for the Treatment of AIDS Steering Committee.

Authors:  M Sharland; D Gibb; C Giaquinto
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Retinal toxicity in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children treated with 2',3'-dideoxyinosine.

Authors:  S M Whitcup; K M Butler; R Caruso; M D de Smet; B Rubin; R N Husson; J S Lopez; R Belfort; P A Pizzo; R B Nussenblatt
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Clinical pharmacology of 2',3'-dideoxyinosine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.

Authors:  F M Balis; P A Pizzo; K M Butler; M E Hawkins; P Brouwers; R N Husson; F Jacobsen; S M Blaney; J Gress; P Jarosinski
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  A pilot study of combination therapy with indinavir, stavudine (d4T), and didanosine (ddI) in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  M W Kline; C V Fletcher; A T Harris; K D Evans; R C Brundage; R P Remmel; N R Calles; S B Kirkpatrick; C Simon
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Pharmacology of nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor-induced mitochondrial toxicity.

Authors:  T N Kakuda
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Genetic variations in HLA-B region and hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir.

Authors:  Seth Hetherington; Arlene R Hughes; Michael Mosteller; Denise Shortino; Katherine L Baker; William Spreen; Eric Lai; Kirstie Davies; Abigail Handley; David J Dow; Mary E Fling; Michael Stocum; Clive Bowman; Linda M Thurmond; Allen D Roses
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of abacavir in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Edmund V Capparelli; Scott L Letendre; Ronald J Ellis; Parul Patel; Diane Holland; J Allen McCutchan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The durability of virological success of tenofovir and didanosine dosed at either 400 or 250 mg once daily.

Authors:  M-Y Tung; S Mandalia; M Bower; B Gazzard; M Nelson
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.180

9.  Replication-dependent 65R-->K reversion in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase double mutant K65R + L74V.

Authors:  Prem L Sharma; Viktoria Nurpeisov; Kimberly Lee; Sara Skaggs; Christina Amat Di San Filippo; Raymond F Schinazi
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  Lamivudine/abacavir maintains virological superiority over zidovudine/lamivudine and zidovudine/abacavir beyond 5 years in children.

Authors:  H Green; D M Gibb; A S Walker; D Pillay; K Butler; F Candeias; G Castelli-Gattinara; A Compagnucci; M Della Negra; A de Rossi; C Feiterna-Sperling; C Giaquinto; L Harper; J Levy; Y Saidi; U Wintergerst
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.177

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current and future antiretroviral treatment options in paediatric HIV infection.

Authors:  Carlo Giaquinto; Erika Morelli; Federica Fregonese; Osvalda Rampon; Martina Penazzato; Anita de Rossi; Ruggero D'Elia
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Clinical practice treatment of HIV infection in children.

Authors:  Bénédicte Brichard; Dimitri Van der Linden
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Lopinavir/Ritonavir versus Lamivudine peri-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV-1 transmission by breastfeeding: the PROMISE-PEP trial Protocol ANRS 12174.

Authors:  Nicolas Nagot; Chipepo Kankasa; Nicolas Meda; Justus Hofmeyr; Cheryl Nikodem; James K Tumwine; Charles Karamagi; Halvor Sommerfelt; Dorine Neveu; Thorkild Tylleskär; Philippe Van de Perre
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.090

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.