Literature DB >> 16813892

Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence.

A P Lont1, M P W Gallee, W Meinhardt, H van Tinteren, S Horenblas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated our experience with primary tumor treatment for T1 and T2 penile squamous cell carcinoma and discussed the clinical implications of a local recurrence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary tumor treatment and clinical course of 257 patients with T1 or T2 penile carcinoma were evaluated. Primary tumor treatment consisted of penis preservation in 157 and (partial) amputation in 100 patients. Median followup was 106 months (range 16 to 541).
RESULTS: The 5-year local recurrence-free estimate after penis preservation was similar for T1 and T2 tumors (log rank test p = 0.1) and overall 63% (CI: 54%-72%) compared to 88% (CI: 81%-95%) for partial amputation (log rank test p = 0.0003). In case of a local recurrence after penis preserving treatment, local control could be achieved in 94% (51 of 54) of cases. Of patients with T1 tumors treated with penis preservation, regional recurrence developed in 33% (7 of 21) of patients with local recurrence compared to only 6% (3 of 47) of patients without local recurrences (Fisher's exact test p = 0.005). Of the patients with T2 tumors treated with penis preservation, regional recurrence developed in 27% (9 of 33) of patients with local recurrence compared to 27% (12 of 45) of patients without local recurrence (chi-square test p = 0.96). Of 10 patients with a local recurrence after partial amputation of the penis, 9 died of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of local recurrence increases with penis preservation but can be treated accurately in most cases. Local recurrences can signify lymphatic regional spread. A local recurrence after penile amputation carries a poor prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813892     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Sexual function after surgical treatment for penile cancer: Which organ-sparing approach gives the best results?

Authors:  Omid Sedigh; Marco Falcone; Carlo Ceruti; Massimiliano Timpano; Mirko Preto; Marco Oderda; Franklin Kuehhas; Mattia Sibona; Arianna Gillo; Paolo Gontero; Luigi Rolle; Bruno Frea
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Surgical treatment of primary disease for penile squamous cell carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Wei-Jie Gu; Hong-Kai Wang; Cheng-Yuan Gu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Management of carcinoma of the penis: Consensus statement from the Canadian Association of Genitourinary Medical Oncologists (CAGMO).

Authors:  Suzanne Richter; J Dean Ruether; Lori Wood; Christina Canil; Patricia Moretto; Peter Venner; Joel Gingerich; Urban Emmenegger; Andrea Eisen; Pawel Zalewski; Anthony Joshua; Som Dave Mukherjee; Daniel Heng; Piotr Czaykowski; Denis Soulieres; Norman Blais; Ricardo Rendon; Neil Fleshner; Juanita M Crook; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  [Reconstructive surgery in penile cancer].

Authors:  M Sohn; M Dietrich; A Wirthmann; U M Rieger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 2-organ-sparing procedures in testicular and penile tumors.

Authors:  Mohamed H Kamel; Mahmoud I Khalil; Ehab Eltahawy; Rodney Davis; Nabil K Bissada
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Penile preserving surgery and surgical strategies to maximize penile form and function in penile cancer: recommendations from the United Kingdom experience.

Authors:  Paul K Hegarty; Majid Shabbir; Ben Hughes; Suks Minhas; Matthew Perry; Nicholas Watkin; David J Ralph
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Progress on Management of Penile Cancer in 2020.

Authors:  Mohamed E Ahmed; Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; R Jeffrey Karnes; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-11-23

8.  Warty Condylomatous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis in a 19-Year-Old.

Authors:  Yauhen Tarbunou; Cindy L Davis; Joseph Costa; Christopher Williams
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-16

Review 9.  Penile-sparing modalities in the management of low-stage penile cancer.

Authors:  Paurush Babbar; Nitin Yerram; Alice Crane; Daniel Sun; Kyle Ericson; Andrew Sun; Abhinav Khanna; Hadley Wood; Andrew Stephenson; Kenneth Angermeier
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

10.  Comparison of efficacy between brachytherapy and penectomy in patients with penile cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiheng Hu; Jianghai Huang; Sailan Wen; Jun Fu; Minfeng Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.