Literature DB >> 16812194

Acquisition and maintenance of trusting behavior.

D F Hake, T L Schmid.   

Abstract

This study determined whether a two-person exchange situation contained natural contingencies for trusting behavior or whether external contingencies were necessary. Pairs of college students worked matching-to-sample problems for money. On each trial there was one problem and the subjects determined which of them would solve it. Trusting behavior was defined as an increase in the number of consecutive problems each subject allowed his partner to work during sessions that also ended with an equitable distribution. Simply, trust was a temporary deviation from equity. A subject could give the problem to the other person (cooperate), or not respond and let the other person take the problem (share). Other possibilities were for both subjects to try to take the problem (complete), or for neither subject to respond and thereby let the person who worked the last problem also work the next one (passive trust). When only four lever pulls were required to distribute a problem (no external contingencies to reach either equity or trust) subjects reached equity, but only minimal trust (strict alternation of single problems) developed in 18 sessions. When 30 or 60 lever pulls were required to distribute a problem (smaller response requirement for passive trust and therefore a contingency for trust), trusting behavior developed after a few sessions (fixed ratio 30) or after several trials of the first session (fixed ratio 60) and it ordinarily expanded gradually to 10 to 15 consecutive problems through passive trust. The aversiveness of the inequity involved in trusting appears to necessitate a contingency for acquisition. Once trust develops, however, this aversiveness is reduced as subjects learn the inequity is only temporary (e.g., once trust was acquired at fixed ratio 60 it was maintained at fixed ratio 4, which would not initially produce it), and the direction of the inequity appears to become of questionable importance (e.g., being behind was alternated over rather than within sessions and usually not in a systematic manner).

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812194      PMCID: PMC1333026          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Switching from competition to sharing or cooperation at large response requirements: competition requires more responding.

Authors:  D F Hake; D Olvera; J C Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Magnitudes of score differences produced within sessions in a cooperative exchange procedure.

Authors:  B A Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The measurement of sharing and cooperation as equity effects and some relationships between them.

Authors:  D F Hake; R Vukelich; D Olvera
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Producing a change from competition to sharing: effects of large and adjusting response requirements.

Authors:  D R Olvera; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Audit responses: responses maintained by access to existing self or coactor scores during non-social, parallel work, and cooperation procedures.

Authors:  D F Hake; R Vukelich; S J Kaplan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Unequal reinforcer magnitudes and relative preference for cooperation in the dyad.

Authors:  E Shimoff; B A Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  The threat of nuclear war: Some responses.

Authors:  A J Marcattilio; J A Nevin
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1986

2.  The influence of Kantor's interbehavioral psychology on behavior analysis.

Authors:  E K Morris; S T Higgins; W K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

3.  Crucial issues in the applied analysis of verbal behavior: reflections on crucial conversations: tools for talking when the stakes are high.

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2010

4.  Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Designing session logistics-how long, how often, how many?

Authors:  D J Bernstein
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1988

5.  Fast acquisition of cooperation and trust: A two-stage view of trusting behavior.

Authors:  T L Schmid; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Jeab at 50: coevolution of research and technology.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Interpersonal relations: Cooperation and competition.

Authors:  D R Schmitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The basic importance of applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  W F Epling; W D Pierce
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1986

9.  The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research.

Authors:  D F Hake
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

10.  Positive and negative reinforcement effects on behavior in a three-person microsociety.

Authors:  H H Emurian; C S Emurian; J V Brady
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.