Literature DB >> 11536563

Positive and negative reinforcement effects on behavior in a three-person microsociety.

H H Emurian1, C S Emurian, J V Brady.   

Abstract

Three-person groups, either of males or of females, resided for 6 to 12 days in a continuously programmed environment. Subjects followed a behavioral program that determined the sequential and contingent relations within an inventory of activities. The program consisted of positive reinforcement days and avoidance days. During a positive reinforcement day, each work unit completed by a subject incremented a group account. The account was divided evenly among the three participants at the conclusion of the study. During a negative reinforcement day, no money was earned, and the group was assigned work unit criterion that, if completed, prevented a reduction in accumulated earnings. During negative reinforcement days, subjects made aggressive verbal responses, which differed in magnitude among the four groups. These differences were evident in several distinct behavioral measures. Performances on components of the work unit were not demonstrably affected by the reinforcement schedules in effect, although during the avoidance condition one subject stopped working and another subject's productivity declined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 11536563      PMCID: PMC1348174          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  29 in total

1.  PAIN-INDUCED FIGHTING IN THE SQUIRREL MONKEY.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; R R HUTCHINSON; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning.

Authors:  H Weiner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcing the absence of fixed-ratio performance.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of a pairing contingency on behavior in a three-person programmed environment.

Authors:  H H Emurian; C S Emurian; J V Brady
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of the difference between self and coactor scores upon the audit responses that allow access to these scores.

Authors:  R Vukelich; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of compatibility, crowding, group size, and leadership seniority on stress, anxiety, hostility, and annoyance in isolated groups.

Authors:  S Smith; W W Haythorn
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1972-04

7.  Attack produced by intermittent reinforcement of a concurrent operant response.

Authors:  R R Hutchinson; N H Azrin; G M Hunt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Schedule-induced aggression as a function of fixed-ratio value.

Authors:  D R Cherek; R Pickens
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Fixed-ratio schedule-induced aggression.

Authors:  W D Gentry
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The ecology of isolated groups.

Authors:  I Altman; W W Haythorn
Journal:  Behav Sci       Date:  1967-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of differential reinforcement of other behavior and response-cost contingencies on tics in youth with Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  Matthew R Capriotti; Bryan C Brandt; Emily J Ricketts; Flint M Espil; Douglas W Woods
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.