Literature DB >> 16812190

Alternative reinforcement effects on fixed-interval performance.

K A Lattal, S S Boyer.   

Abstract

Pigeons' key pecks were reinforced with food on a fixed-interval schedule. Food also was available at variable time periods either independently of responding or for not key pecking (a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior schedule). The latter condition arranged reinforcement following the first pause of t seconds after it became available according to a variable-time schedule. This schedule allowed separation of the effects of pause requirements </= five-seconds and reinforcement frequency. The time spent pausing increased as the duration of the pause required for reinforcement increased from 0 to 30 seconds and as the frequency of reinforcement for pausing increased from 0 to 2 reinforcers per minute. Key pecking was more evenly distributed within each fixed interval with shorter required pauses and with more frequent reinforcement for pausing. The results complement those obtained with other concurrent schedules in which the same operant response was reinforced in both components.

Year:  1980        PMID: 16812190      PMCID: PMC1333007          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Elimination of reinforced behavior: intermittent schedules of not-responding.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules.

Authors:  A J Trevett; M C Davison; R J Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of concurrent response-independent reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance.

Authors:  K A Lattal; A J Bryan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter?

Authors:  H Rachlin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Positive reinforcement and the elimination of reinforced responses.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on problem behavior and stimulus engagement: the role of satiation, extinction, and alternative reinforcement.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; J L Crockett; M van Stone; I G DeLeon; L G Bowman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Effects of alternative reinforcement on human behavior: the source does matter.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Discriminability between alternatives in a switching-key concurrent schedule.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Superimposition of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  I S Burgess; J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.