Literature DB >> 16812005

Selective punishment early and late in fixed-ratio schedules of food reinforcement.

P W Dodd, S M Williams, M L Bissell, R G Weisman.   

Abstract

Pigeons key pecked for grain on a fixed-ratio 100 schedule; electric shocks occurred intermittently at the fifteenth or eighty-fifth response in the ratio. In Experiment I, shock was at the fifteenth response for two birds, and at the eighty-fifth response for two others, in every sixth, twelfth, or eighteenth ratio. Rate of responding decreased as frequency of shock increased, and the pattern of responding included an increased initial pause and low rates or pause-run sequences that extended further into the ratio when shock was at the fifteenth response than when it was at the eighty-fifth response. Shock early in the ratio engendered longer initial pauses than shock late in the ratio. In Experiment II, four birds responded on a two-component multiple schedule in which shock occurred at the fifteenth response of the third ratio in the presence of a white keylight and at the eighty-fifth response of the third ratio in the presence of a green keylight. The overall rates of responding decreased as shock intensity increased. All four birds responded differentially to the white and green keylights, but with a pattern that varied between birds. In general, punishment reduced the probability of responses that preceded it, regardless of the ordinal position of those responses. Both studies confirm that the probability of responding is reduced less by aversive stimuli produced late in a fixed-ratio than by aversive stimuli produced early in a fixed-ratio.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16812005      PMCID: PMC1333574          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  SOME NOTES ON CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION AND REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES.

Authors:  D O LYON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF FIXED-RATIO PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  J F DARDANO; D SAUERBRUNN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  M SIDMAN; W C STEBBINS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-04

4.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Fractional punishment of fixed-ratio performance.

Authors:  J F Dardano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Variable location of punishment in a response sequence.

Authors:  J F Dardano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response-dependent shock in second-order fixed-ratio schedules of food presentation.

Authors:  R G Weisman; E R Davis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Positive and negative reinforcement effects on behavior in a three-person microsociety.

Authors:  H H Emurian; C S Emurian; J V Brady
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.