Literature DB >> 16811870

Short-component multiple schedules: effects of relative reinforcement duration.

W H Merigan, J S Miller, L R Gollub.   

Abstract

Pigeons were exposed to multiple variable-interval 2-min variable-interval 2-min schedules of food presentation in which relative duration of food presentation was manipulated. When components alternated every 5 sec and were scheduled on separate response keys, relative response rates closely matched relative reinforcement duration in three of four pigeons. On the other hand, relative response rates were insensitive to relative reinforcement duration when components scheduled on a single response key alternated every 5 sec, and when components scheduled on separate response keys alternated every 2 min. Thus, both rapid alternation and spatial separation of components were necessary to produce approximate matching of relative responding to relative reinforcement duration. This finding contrasts with previous findings that only rapid component alternation is necessary for matching when relative rate of reinforcement is manipulated.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811870      PMCID: PMC1333397          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  RELATIVE RATE OF RESPONSE AND RELATIVE MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENT IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES.

Authors:  S SHETTLEWORTH; J A NEVIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Authors:  C P Shimp; K L Wheatley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus.

Authors:  A J Brownstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents.

Authors:  D G Lander; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  L Charman; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Resistance to change and the law of effect.

Authors:  D N Harper; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of reinforcer duration on responding in two-link chained interval schedules.

Authors:  K W Lendenmann; D L Myers; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Contrast and undermatching as a function of reinforcer duration and quality during multiple schedules.

Authors:  R H Ettinger; F K McSweeney; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Temporal proximity and reinforcement sensitivity in multiple schedules.

Authors:  K G White; M E Pipe; A P McLean; S Redman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus and reinforcer relativity in multiple schedules: Local and dimensional effects on sensitivity to reinforcement.

Authors:  K G White; M E Pipe; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The generalized matching law as a description of multiple-schedule responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; V A Farmer; J D Dougan; J E Whipple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effects of component duration on multiple-schedule performance in closed and open economies.

Authors:  M H La Fiette; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  An equation for behavioral contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.