Literature DB >> 16811845

Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli.

K A Lattal.   

Abstract

A matching paradigm was used to examine the discriminative properties of two different reinforcement contingencies. Responding according to either a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate or a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior schedule produced a choice situation in which each of two keys was illuminated with a unique color. The correct choice response was defined by the contingency that was met to produce the choice. Eighty to 100% correct matching was obtained and recovered during two reversals of the choice stimuli. Introduction of a delay between completion of the reinforcement contingency and presentation of the choice stimuli resulted in decrements in matching performances similar to those obtained when other types of sample stimuli are used. The results provided evidence of the discriminative properties of the relation between behavior and other classes of stimuli.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811845      PMCID: PMC1333345          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  SIGNAL DETECTION IN FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULES.

Authors:  M RILLING; C MCDIARMID
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The discrimination of contingent from noncontingent reinforcement.

Authors:  J B APPEL; R H HISS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

3.  Delayed matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Response-reinforcer dependence and independence in multiple and mixed schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons.

Authors:  A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Acquisition and transfer of zero-delay matching.

Authors:  W W Cumming; R Berryman; L R Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1965-10

9.  Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Rilling
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-02

10.  Some discriminative properties of fixed ratio performance in the pigeon.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; I Goldiamond
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  25 in total

1.  A procedure for generating differential "sample" responding without different exteroceptive stimuli.

Authors:  Karen M Lionello-DeNolf; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of differences in interreinforcer intervals between past and current schedules on fixed-interval responding.

Authors:  Hiroto Okouchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Contingency and behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

4.  Differing views of contingencies: How contiguous?

Authors:  K A Lattal; T A Shahan
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1997

5.  Response-reinforcer dependency location in interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; T J Freeman; T S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Memory for recent behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  S P Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of alternative reinforcement sources: A reevaluation.

Authors:  A A Imam; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations.

Authors:  S Dymond; D Barnes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Decision rules and signal detectability in a reinforcement-density discrimination.

Authors:  M L Commons
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The influences of guiding cues on motor skill autonomy in rats.

Authors:  Alliston K Reid; Grace Demarco; Kelsey Smith; Theodore Fort; Erica Cousins
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.