Literature DB >> 16812573

Response-reinforcer dependency location in interval schedules of reinforcement.

K A Lattal, T J Freeman, T S Critchfield.   

Abstract

In five experiments we studied the effects on pigeons' key pecking of the location of four or more successive response-dependent reinforcers imbedded in a schedule arranging otherwise response-independent reinforcers. In Experiment 1, high local response rates early in the session were extended farther into the session as the number of response-dependent reinforcers at the beginning of the session increased. A block of four successive response-dependent reinforcers then was scheduled at the beginning, middle, or end of the session (Experiment 2) resulting in higher local response rates at those times in the session when the response-dependent reinforcers were arranged. When placed in random locations in successive sessions (Experiment 3), uniform local rates occurred throughout the session. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3, delivery of the remaining response-independent reinforcers was precluded until the response-dependent reinforcers were collected. Experiment 4 was similar to Experiments 1 and 2, except that all response-independent reinforcers occurred irrespective of whether the response-dependent reinforcers had been collected. This yielded results similar to those obtained in the first two experiments. In Experiment 5, responding early in the session had no consequence other than allowing access to the schedule of response-independent food delivery. As in the first experiment, local rates generally were higher early in the session. The results indicate that the location of response-reinforcer dependencies precisely control behavior and that such effects often are not captured by descriptions of behavior in terms of overall response rates.

Year:  1989        PMID: 16812573      PMCID: PMC1338895          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Elimination of reinforced behavior: intermittent schedules of not-responding.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior.

Authors:  L J Hammond
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?

Authors:  J A Nevin; L D Smith; J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Decision rules and signal detectability in a reinforcement-density discrimination.

Authors:  M L Commons
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter?

Authors:  H Rachlin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Combinations of response-reinforcer dependence and independence.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Separating response dependency and response-reinforcer contiguity within a recycling conjunctive schedule.

Authors:  M Keenan; J C Leslie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Response-reinforcer dependence and independence in multiple and mixed schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contingency and behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

Review 2.  Temporal contingency.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; Andrew R Craig; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 1.777

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.