Literature DB >> 12696741

Effects of differences in interreinforcer intervals between past and current schedules on fixed-interval responding.

Hiroto Okouchi1.   

Abstract

Undergraduates were exposed to a mixed fixed-ratio differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule. Values of the schedule components were adjusted so that interreinforcer intervals in one component were longer than those in another component. Following this, a mixed fixed-interval 5-s fixed-interval 20-s schedule (Experiment 1) or six fixed-interval schedules in which the values ranged from 5 to 40 s (Experiment 2) were in effect. In both experiments, response rates under the fixed-interval schedules were higher when the interreinforcer intervals approximated those produced under the fixed-ratio schedule, whereas the rates were lower when the interreinforcer intervals approximated those produced under the different-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule. The present results demonstrate that the effects of behavioral history were under control of the interreinforcer intervals as discriminative stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12696741      PMCID: PMC1284921          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  31 in total

1.  Stimulus control of behavioral history.

Authors:  T J Freeman; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of instructions and reinforcement-feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  A Baron; A Kaufman; K A Stauber
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Controlling human fixed-interval performance.

Authors:  H Weiner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Temporal control of behavior and the power law.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P Harzem; P T Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Instructions as discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  H Okouchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Correlation between self-reported rigidity and rule-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies.

Authors:  E Wulfert
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

7.  Determinants of human performance on concurrent schedules.

Authors:  P J Horne; C F Lowe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  d-amphetamine and fixed-interval performance: effects of operant history.

Authors:  C Urbain; A Poling; J Millam; T Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effects of schedule history and the opportunity for adjunctive responding on behavior during a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  L M Johnson; W K Bickel; S T Higgins; E K Morris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  CONDITIONING HISTORY AND HUMAN FIXED-INTERVAL PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  H WEINER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stimulus generalization of behavioral history.

Authors:  Hiroto Okouchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of experience on preference between forced and free choice.

Authors:  Koichi Ono
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.