Literature DB >> 16811838

Response additivity: effects of superimposed free reinforcement on a variable-interval baseline.

R A Boakes, M S Halliday, M Poli.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effects of superimposing free reinforcement (Free VI 30-sec) on behavior maintained by a response dependent mult VI 2-min VI 2-min schedule of reinforcement. Experiment I used pigeons as subjects, key pecking as the response, and colors of response key as the stimuli associated with the multiple-schedule components. When free reinforcement was added during only one component (Differential condition) a large and highly significant increase in response rate developed in this component. Adding free reinforcement during both components (Nondifferential condition) produced smaller and far less-consistent effects. An entirely different pattern of results was obtained in two subsequent experiments, where similar procedures and reinforcement conditions were used with rats as subjects and bar pressing as the response. In both Experiments II and III, response rates decreased to the stimulus associated with added free reinforcement in the Differential condition. These findings are interpreted as the result of interactions between behavior maintained by response-reinforcer contingencies and behavior maintained by stimulus-reinforcer contingencies. As such, they support the main assumption of an autoshaping theory of behavioral contrast, that additivity of responding generated by the two kinds of contingency can occur only in situations favorable to autoshaping.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811838      PMCID: PMC1333338          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Positive conditioned suppression: effects of CS duration.

Authors:  K A Miczek; S P Grossman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response decrements produced by extinction and by response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Facilitation of food-reinforced responding by a signal for response-independent food.

Authors:  V M Lolordo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules.

Authors:  J J Pear; D M Wilkie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effect of lesions in the amygdala on behavioral contrast.

Authors:  P G Henke; J D Allen; C Davison
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1972-02

7.  Behavioral contrast in pigeons depends upon the operant.

Authors:  N S Hemmes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-10

8.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Conditioned suppression and conditioned enhancement with the same positive UCS: an effect of CS duration.

Authors:  D Meltzer; J A Brahlek
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Economic and biological influences on key pecking and treadle pressing in pigeons.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Daniel D Holt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast and the automaintained key peck.

Authors:  R K Wesp; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Some tests of the additivity (autoshaping) theory of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  E Hearst; D Gormley
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1976-05

Review 4.  Adjunctive behaviors are operants.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Ricardo Pellón
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?

Authors:  J A Nevin; M E Tota; R D Torquato; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.