Literature DB >> 16811477

Independently delivered food decelerates fixed-ratio rates.

D D Edwards, V Peek, F Wolfe.   

Abstract

Following fixed-ratio baselines, the independent delivery of reinforcers was scheduled alone or concomitant with the fixed-ratio schedule for all subjects. Systematic manipulations of either the interreinforcement interval or the ratio size were also made during concomitant schedules. Response rates during the independent delivery of reinforcers did not decelerate until the subjects had been exposed for 50 or more sessions. Rates decelerated after a few sessions when the interreinforcement intervals were less than half of the original value and scheduled along with the ratio dependency. When both schedules were available, reductions in the ratio size resulted in slight deceleration of response rate when compared with the level of deceleration yielded by reductions in the independent reinforcement intervals.

Year:  1970        PMID: 16811477      PMCID: PMC1333737          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  3 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of protein deficiency on maze performance of domestic Norway rats.

Authors:  W J GRIFFITHS; R J SENTER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-02

3.  The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  F C Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total
  11 in total

1.  Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on problem behavior and stimulus engagement: the role of satiation, extinction, and alternative reinforcement.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; J L Crockett; M van Stone; I G DeLeon; L G Bowman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Effects of alternative reinforcement on human behavior: the source does matter.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A suggestion for describing combinations of response-dependent and response-independent events.

Authors:  A A Imam; K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1992

Review 4.  A review of reinforcement control procedures.

Authors:  Rachel H Thompson; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

5.  Response-reinforcer independence and the economic continuum: A preliminary analysis.

Authors:  A A Imam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Positive conditioned suppression: an explanation in terms of multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; J E Hughes; S L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of concurrent response-independent reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance.

Authors:  K A Lattal; A J Bryan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Superimposition of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  I S Burgess; J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Combinations of response-reinforcer dependence and independence.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reponse-reinforcer independence and conventional extinction after fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.