Literature DB >> 5150045

Overt activity during conditioned suppression: a search for punishment artifacts.

H S Hoffman, J Barrett.   

Abstract

Pigeons, previously trained to peck a key (using food as the reinforcer), were permitted unlimited access to food and, concurrently, key pecking was allowed to go unreinforced until all pecking ceased. A tone ending with electrical shock was then repeatedly presented in an effort to establish the tone as a potentially suppressing stimulus. When key pecking was later reestablished, tone presentation (without shock) sharply reduced the rate of pecks. At selected points throughout the experiment, special observation procedures supplemented the recordings of key pecks and provided detailed fine-grain protocols of the birds' overt movements during the periods before, during, and after tone presentations. Results indicated that neither punishment of key pecks nor punishment of other overt movements was a necessary precursor to the conditioned suppression observed in the final stage. As such, the findings support interpretations of conditioned suppression that characterize the phenomenon as reflecting a conditioned emotional reaction that either directly or indirectly inhibits overt activity.

Mesh:

Year:  1971        PMID: 5150045      PMCID: PMC1333935          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  The effect of electroconvulsive shock on a conditioned emotional response: a control for acquisition recency.

Authors:  I GELLER; M SIDMAN; J V BRADY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1955-04

2.  Punishment. II. An interpretation of empirical findings.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Collateral behavior of the pigeon during conditioned suppression of key pecking.

Authors:  N Stein; H S Hoffman; C Stitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

6.  Response rate, reinforcement frequency, and conditioned suppression.

Authors:  D Blackman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Conditioned suppression, punishment, and aversion.

Authors:  D W Orme-Johnson; M Yarczower
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.