Literature DB >> 16811643

Combined-stimulus control as a function of the response rate controlled by the absence of the single stimuli.

R A Wiltz.   

Abstract

Rat's bar-press responses were maintained at moderate rates during separate presentations of light and tone by separate but concurrent variable-interval schedules of food and shock presentation. The relative response rate maintained during light-out-no-tone was alternated in four successive phases: in Phases 1 and 3 responding was maintained at a higher rate than that during light and tone alone by a variable-interval food schedule, while in Phases 2 and 4 responding was reduced to a lower rate by a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior food schedule. In test presentations of light, tone and a light-plus-tone combination, administered at the end of each phase, the proportion of responses emitted during light-plus-tone was an inverse function of the relative response rate controlled by light-out-no-tone, indicating that the relative training response rate controlled by the absence of the single stimuli determined the control exerted by the combined stimuli. Different relative response rates maintained in training may also be partly responsible for previously observed differences in the form of generalization gradients following the establishment of multi-stimulus control.

Entities:  

Year:  1972        PMID: 16811643      PMCID: PMC1334041          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Some effects of combined S-DS.

Authors:  M M WOLF
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Summation of responding maintained by fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  L Miller; R Ackley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Compounding discriminative stimuli controlling free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  H H Emurian; S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Summation of punishment suppression.

Authors:  R Van Houten; R Rudolph
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Stimulus factors in aversive controls: conditioned suppression after equal training to two stimuli.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; W L Selekman; M Fleshler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Combining stimuli signalling response-dependent food and shock.

Authors:  R A Wiltz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.