Literature DB >> 4045376

The effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine on rate and stimulus control of matching to sample.

M C Newland, M J Marr.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to perform simultaneous, two-color matching to sample under a multiple fixed-ratio fixed-interval schedule of food presentation. The sequence terminating with a peck on the matching key (a "match") was treated as a unit, analogous to a single key peck in conventional schedules. Except for intermittent reinforcement of matches, no consequent stimulus distinguished matches from mismatches (sequences terminating with pecks on the nonmatching key). The pattern of matches during nondrug sessions resembled that of simpler operants maintained by similar schedules. Matches increased in rate toward the end of both components; mismatch rates increased more slowly. Imipramine increased the rate of mismatches, disrupted schedule patterning, and lowered accuracy in a dose-dependent fashion. Chlorpromazine lowered the overall rate of matches but affected schedule patterns and accuracy less than imipramine. The types of errors during drug sessions were not systematically related to the types of errors that appeared during nondrug sessions. Stimulus control was evaluated for each of the four possible color configurations and was found to be by the entire configuration of colors, not simply by the color of the sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4045376      PMCID: PMC1348160          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  29 in total

Review 1.  Rate-dependent effects of drugs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Fixed-interval matching-to-sample: intermatching time and intermatching error runs.

Authors:  T D Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of a conditioned reinforcer upon accuracy of match-to-sample behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  H B Clark; J A Sherman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Repeated acquisition of behavioral chains: effects of methylphenidate and imipramine.

Authors:  D M Thompson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  A detailed analysis of the effects of d-amphetamine on behavior under fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  M N Branch; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Modification of the effects of chlorpromazine on behavior in the chimpanzee.

Authors:  L D Byrd
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  A microanalysis of drug effects on fixed-ratio performance in pigeons.

Authors:  B Weiss; C T Gott
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Effects of chlorpromazine on food-maintained and observing behavior.

Authors:  M E Dearing; M N Branch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors.

Authors:  P J Urcuioli; W K Honig
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1980-07

10.  Drugs and visual perception: effects of LSD, morphine and chloropromazine on accuracy, bias and speed.

Authors:  K B West; L L Hernandez; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  3 in total

1.  Selected publication trends in JEAB: Implications for the vitality of the experimental analysis of behavior.

Authors:  Bryan K Saville; L Kimberly Epting; William Buskist
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  How research in behavioral pharmacology informs behavioral science.

Authors:  Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Order in the absence of an effect: Identifying rate-dependent relationships.

Authors:  Sarah E Snider; Amanda J Quisenberry; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.777

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.