PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship of serum S-100B and C-tau levels to long-term outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (mild TBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: A prospective study of 35 mild TBI subjects presenting to the emergency department. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Six hour serum S-100B and C-tau levels compared to 3-month Rivermead Post Concussion Questionnaire (RPCQ) scores and post-concussive syndrome (PCS). MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The linear correlation between marker levels and RPCQ scores was weak (S-100B: r = 0.071, C-tau: r = -0.21). There was no statistically significant correlation between marker levels and 3-month PCS (S-100B: AUC = 0.589, 95%CI. 038, 0.80; C-tau: AUC = 0.634, 95%CI 0.43, 0.84). The sensitivity of these markers ranged from 43.8-56.3% and the specificity from 35.7-71.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Initial serum S-100B and C-tau levels appear to be poor predictors of 3-month outcome after mild TBI.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship of serum S-100B and C-tau levels to long-term outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (mild TBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: A prospective study of 35 mild TBI subjects presenting to the emergency department. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Six hour serum S-100B and C-tau levels compared to 3-month Rivermead Post Concussion Questionnaire (RPCQ) scores and post-concussive syndrome (PCS). MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The linear correlation between marker levels and RPCQ scores was weak (S-100B: r = 0.071, C-tau: r = -0.21). There was no statistically significant correlation between marker levels and 3-month PCS (S-100B: AUC = 0.589, 95%CI. 038, 0.80; C-tau: AUC = 0.634, 95%CI 0.43, 0.84). The sensitivity of these markers ranged from 43.8-56.3% and the specificity from 35.7-71.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Initial serum S-100B and C-tau levels appear to be poor predictors of 3-month outcome after mild TBI.
Authors: Linda Papa; Lawrence M Lewis; Jay L Falk; Zhiqun Zhang; Salvatore Silvestri; Philip Giordano; Gretchen M Brophy; Jason A Demery; Neha K Dixit; Ian Ferguson; Ming Cheng Liu; Jixiang Mo; Linnet Akinyi; Kara Schmid; Stefania Mondello; Claudia S Robertson; Frank C Tortella; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K W Wang Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Tatiana Falcone; Damir Janigro; Rachel Lovell; Barry Simon; Charles A Brown; Mariela Herrera; Aye Mu Myint; Amit Anand Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-12-25 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Aaron J Carman; Rennie Ferguson; Robert Cantu; R Dawn Comstock; Penny A Dacks; Steven T DeKosky; Sam Gandy; James Gilbert; Chad Gilliland; Gerard Gioia; Christopher Giza; Michael Greicius; Brian Hainline; Ronald L Hayes; James Hendrix; Barry Jordan; James Kovach; Rachel F Lane; Rebekah Mannix; Thomas Murray; Tad Seifert; Diana W Shineman; Eric Warren; Elisabeth Wilde; Huntington Willard; Howard M Fillit Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Mark S Dziemianowicz; Matthew P Kirschen; Bryan A Pukenas; Eric Laudano; Laura J Balcer; Steven L Galetta Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Linda Papa; Michelle M Ramia; Damyan Edwards; Brian D Johnson; Semyon M Slobounov Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 5.269