Literature DB >> 16808562

An estimate of craniofacial growth in Class III malocclusion.

Brian C Reyes1, Tiziano Baccetti, James A McNamara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an estimate of growth in Class III malocclusion by means of the analysis of a large population of males and females.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The examined sample consisted of pretreatment lateral cephalometric records of 949 (492 females and 457 males) untreated Class III patients of Caucasian ancestry. Cephalometric dentoskeletal measurements at subsequent age periods in Class III subjects were compared with the population values from subjects included in the University of Michigan Growth Study (UMGS) at 11 consecutive age periods (from 6 through 16 years of age), in male and female groups separately.
RESULTS: No difference was found between the Class III and normal groups for the sagittal position of the maxilla at any of the age intervals examined. Sagittal mandibular position and dimensions in Class III subjects were consistently larger than in normal subjects, with the interval of largest "increase" in mandibular length occurring on average 1 year later in both female and male Class III subject with respect to subjects with normal occlusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Increases in mandibular length were substantially larger in Class III subjects than in subjects with normal occlusion even during the more mature age interval (15 to 16 years). Lower anterior facial height was significantly larger in Class III individuals during the late developmental stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808562     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0577:AEOCGI]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  19 in total

1.  Appropriateness of standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of dentofacial characteristics in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Francesca Del Re; Ingrid Tonni; Min Gu; Domenico Dalessandri; Luca Visconti
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Craniofacial growth and morphology among intersecting clinical categories.

Authors:  Ryan P Knigge; Anna M Hardin; Kevin M Middleton; Kieran P McNulty; Hee Soo Oh; Manish Valiathan; Dana L Duren; Richard J Sherwood
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.227

3.  Craniofacial growth of Class III subjects six to sixteen years of age.

Authors:  Sara M Wolfe; Eustaquio Araujo; Rolf G Behrents; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Using networks to understand medical data: the case of Class III malocclusions.

Authors:  Antonio Scala; Pietro Auconi; Marco Scazzocchio; Guido Caldarelli; James A McNamara; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Yalil Augusto Rodriguez-Cardenas; Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillen; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

6.  The duration of pubertal growth peak among three skeletal classes.

Authors:  Waqar Jeelani; Mubassar Fida; Attiya Shaikh
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

7.  Sagittal and Vertical Craniofacial Growth Pattern and Timing of Circumpubertal Skeletal Maturation: A Multiple Regression Study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perinetti; Luigi Rosso; Riccardo Riatti; Luca Contardo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Retrospective 25-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in angle Class III patients : Early versus late treatment.

Authors:  B Wendl; A P Muchitsch; H Winsauer; A Walter; H Droschl; N Jakse; M Wendl; T Wendl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Duration of the pubertal peak in skeletal Class I and Class III subjects.

Authors:  Małgorzata Kuc-Michalska; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships.

Authors:  Susan N Al-Khateeb; Emad F Al Maaitah; Elham S Abu Alhaija; Serene A Badran
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.