Fabio Savoldi1, Francesca Del Re2, Ingrid Tonni2, Min Gu1, Domenico Dalessandri2, Luca Visconti2. 1. Orthodontics, Division of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 2. Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare skeletal syndrome affecting craniofacial and dental development. As a consequence, conventional cephalometric landmarks may not be valid for CCD patients, and the appropriateness of norms used for the general population should be critically discussed. METHODS: Five patients 9- to 22-year-old (three females, two males) with CCD were included. Lateral-cephalograms, orthopantomographies, and intra-oral photos were retrospectively analysed. Lateral-cephalograms of 50 normal controls (ten for each CCD patient) matched for age and sex were selected from an online database. Cephalometric measurements of each CCD patients were compared with average values of matched controls using Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired values (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In CCD patients, a shortening of the cranial base was present (ΔSN = -17.1 mm, p = 0.043). Thus, the mandible (ΔSNPg = +9.5°, p = 0.043) and the maxilla (ΔSNA = +11.2°, p = 0.043) showed protrusion compared to the cranial base, despite a reduced maxillary (ΔCo-A = -15.1 mm, p = 0.043) and mandibular (ΔCo-Gn = -15.2 mm, p = 0.080) length. The mandibular divergence was reduced (ΔSN/GoGn = -6.4°, p = 0.043), a reduced overbite was present (ΔOverbite = -2.9 mm, p = 0.043), and the interincisal angle was increased (ΔInterincisalAngle = +13.7°, p = 0.043), mainly due to retro-inclination of lower incisors. CONCLUSIONS: Standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of horizontal jaw position may not be applicable to CCD patients because of a reduced anterior cranial base length compared to normal subjects. Vertical relationships may not be affected, and mandibular hypodivergency was confirmed.
OBJECTIVES: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare skeletal syndrome affecting craniofacial and dental development. As a consequence, conventional cephalometric landmarks may not be valid for CCD patients, and the appropriateness of norms used for the general population should be critically discussed. METHODS: Five patients 9- to 22-year-old (three females, two males) with CCD were included. Lateral-cephalograms, orthopantomographies, and intra-oral photos were retrospectively analysed. Lateral-cephalograms of 50 normal controls (ten for each CCD patient) matched for age and sex were selected from an online database. Cephalometric measurements of each CCD patients were compared with average values of matched controls using Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired values (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In CCD patients, a shortening of the cranial base was present (ΔSN = -17.1 mm, p = 0.043). Thus, the mandible (ΔSNPg = +9.5°, p = 0.043) and the maxilla (ΔSNA = +11.2°, p = 0.043) showed protrusion compared to the cranial base, despite a reduced maxillary (ΔCo-A = -15.1 mm, p = 0.043) and mandibular (ΔCo-Gn = -15.2 mm, p = 0.080) length. The mandibular divergence was reduced (ΔSN/GoGn = -6.4°, p = 0.043), a reduced overbite was present (ΔOverbite = -2.9 mm, p = 0.043), and the interincisal angle was increased (ΔInterincisalAngle = +13.7°, p = 0.043), mainly due to retro-inclination of lower incisors. CONCLUSIONS: Standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of horizontal jaw position may not be applicable to CCD patients because of a reduced anterior cranial base length compared to normal subjects. Vertical relationships may not be affected, and mandibular hypodivergency was confirmed.
Authors: G Zhou; Y Chen; L Zhou; K Thirunavukkarasu; J Hecht; D Chitayat; B D Gelb; S Pirinen; S A Berry; C R Greenberg; G Karsenty; B Lee Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Travis L Gibson; Barry H Grayson; Joseph G McCarthy; Pradip R Shetye Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 2.650