Literature DB >> 16806389

Flank facilitation and contour integration: different sites.

Pi-Chun Huang1, Robert F Hess, Steven C Dakin.   

Abstract

Observers' ability to integrate features into extended contours, and to exploit the flanking structure to facilitate contrast detection (flank facilitation), exhibit a similar dependence on element spacing and orientation. Here, we investigate whether this reflects the operation of a common cortical mechanism by comparing performance for both tasks under monocular, binocular, dichoptic, and stereoscopic viewing conditions. Our results clearly implicate different cortical sites for flank-facilitated detection and contour integration; the former is a purely monocular phenomenon and must therefore occur at the earliest stages of cortical processing. In contrast, contour integration is a binocular process and occurs after the encoding of relative disparity, suggesting substantial extra-striate involvement. We conclude that the sites, and therefore the mechanisms, underlying these two seemingly related psychophysical phenomena are different.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16806389     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Global contour processing in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu; Shu-Guang Kuai; Elizabeth Rislove
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  An exploration of the spatial scale over which orientation-dependent surround effects affect contour detection.

Authors:  Jennifer F Schumacher; Christina F Quinn; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Masking, crowding, and grouping: Connecting low and mid-level vision.

Authors:  Josephine Reuther; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jasna Martinovic
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Robert J Summers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Interocular induction of illusory size perception.

Authors:  Chen Song; D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Interpreting local visual features as a global shape requires awareness.

Authors:  D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration.

Authors:  Malte Persike; Günter Meinhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Filling-in and suppression of visual perception from context: a Bayesian account of perceptual biases by contextual influences.

Authors:  Li Zhaoping; Li Jingling
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  A vision science perspective on schizophrenia.

Authors:  Steven M Silverstein; Judy L Thompson
Journal:  Schizophr Res Cogn       Date:  2015-06

Review 10.  The development of contour processing: evidence from physiology and psychophysics.

Authors:  Gemma Taylor; Daniel Hipp; Alecia Moser; Kelly Dickerson; Peter Gerhardstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.