Literature DB >> 16805681

The effect of rhBMP-2 around endosseous implants with and without membranes in the canine model.

Archie A Jones1, Daniel Buser, Robert Schenk, John Wozney, David L Cochran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is a potent differentiating agent for cells of the osteoblastic lineage. It has been used in the oral cavity under a variety of indications and with different carriers. However, the optimal carrier for each indication is not known. This study examined a synthetic bioabsorbable carrier for BMP used in osseous defects around dental implants in the canine mandible.
METHODS: Twelve canines had their mandibular four premolars and first molar teeth extracted bilaterally. After 5 months, four implants were placed with standardized circumferential defects around the coronal 4 mm of each implant. One-half of the defects received a polylactide/glycolide (PLGA) polymer carrier with or without recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2), and the other half received a collagen carrier with or without rhBMP-2. Additionally, one-half of the implants were covered with a non-resorbable (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [ePTFE]) membrane to exclude soft tissues. Animals were sacrificed either 4 or 12 weeks later. Histomorphometric analysis included the percentage of new bone contact with the implant, the area of new bone, and the percentage of defect fill. This article describes results with the PLGA carrier.
RESULTS: All implants demonstrated clinical and radiographic success with the amount of new bone formed dependent on the time and presence/absence of rhBMP-2 and presence/absence of a membrane. The percentage of bone-to-implant contact was greater with rhBMP-2, and after 12 weeks of healing, there was approximately one-third of the implant contacting bone in the defect site. After 4 weeks, the presence of a membrane appeared to slow new bone area formation. The percentage of fill in membrane-treated sites with rhBMP-2 rose from 24% fill to 42% after 4 and 12 weeks, respectively. Without rhBMP-2, the percentage of fill was 14% rising to 36% fill, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: After 4 weeks, the rhBMP-2-treated sites had a significantly higher percentage of contact, more new bone area, and higher percentage of defect fill than the sites without rhBMP-2. After 12 weeks, there was no significant difference in sites with or without rhBMP-2 regarding percentage of contact, new bone area, or percentage of defect fill. In regard to these three outcomes, comparing the results with this carrier to the results reported earlier with a collagen carrier in this study, only the area of new bone was significantly different with the collagen carrier resulting in greater bone than the PLGA carrier. Thus, the PLGA carrier for rhBMP-2 significantly stimulated bone formation around dental implants in this model after 1 month but not after 3 months of healing. The use of this growth factor and carrier combination appears to stimulate early bone healing events around the implants but not quite to the same degree as a collagen carrier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16805681     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.050337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  14 in total

1.  The use of calcium phosphate-based biomaterials in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Cheng Xie; Hong Lu; Wei Li; Fa-Ming Chen; Yi-Min Zhao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Effect of Attapulgite-Doped Electrospun Fibrous PLGA Scaffold on Pro-Osteogenesis and Barrier Function in the Application of Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Xinru Xie; Xiangyang Shi; Shaoyi Wang; Lingyan Cao; Chi Yang; Zhigui Ma
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-09-11

3.  3D Printed Gelatin/Sodium Alginate Hydrogel Scaffolds Doped with Nano-Attapulgite for Bone Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Chun Liu; Wen Qin; Yan Wang; Jiayi Ma; Jun Liu; Siyu Wu; Hongbin Zhao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-12-30

Review 4.  Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Niklaus P Lang; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Single stage reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects by bone graft in a synthetic membrane.

Authors:  Mostafa Abdelkhalek; Barakat S El-Alfy; Ayman M Ali
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Treatment with a growth factor-protein mixture inhibits formation of mineralized nodules in osteogenic cell cultures grown on titanium.

Authors:  Marcos Andrade de Oliva; William Marcatti Amarú Maximiano; Larissa Moreira Spínola de Castro; Paulo Eliandro da Silva; Roger Rodrigo Fernandes; Pietro Ciancaglini; Márcio Mateus Beloti; Antonio Nanci; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Novel analysis model for implant osseointegration using ectopic bone formation via the recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate block system in rats: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Jung-Chul Park; Jong-Bin Lee; Guy Daculsi; Sang-Yeop Oh; Kyoo-Sung Cho; Gun-Il Im; Byung-Soo Kim; Chang-Sung Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 8.  Membranes for the Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Sang-Woon Lee; Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 9.  Dental pulp stem cells. Biology and use for periodontal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Nahid Y Ashri; Sumaiah A Ajlan; Abdullah M Aldahmash
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 10.  Bone Regeneration Using Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and Various Biomaterial Carriers.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Mohammad Ahmad Javaid; Nader Hamdan; Raheel Hashmi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.