Literature DB >> 8417616

Telephone health surveys: potential bias from noncompletion.

S I Mishra1, D Dooley, R Catalano, S Serxner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the effect of noncompletion on telephone surveys of health issues. This paper identifies a little-studied source of noncompletion, passive refusal, and evaluates its contribution to noncompletion bias along with two other sources: noncooperation and noncontact. Passive refusals include respondents who repeatedly request callbacks and households where interviewers repeatedly encounter an answering machine.
METHODS: Measures of noncompletion (noncooperation, passive refusal, and noncontact), demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health risk factors, and indicators of health care access and health status were collected through the Orange County Health Surveys on 4893 respondents. The surveys sampled by random-digit dialing and interviewed by computer-assisted telephone.
RESULTS: Passive refusals have a substantial impact on completion rates and bias due to noncompletion. Commonly used definitions for completion rates may underestimate the bias due to noncompletion because they omit passive refusals. After we controlled for demographic and socioeconomic factors, few noncompletion biases appeared on selected health indicators.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest improved reporting of completion rates and support a multivariate framework for studying noncompletion in telephone health surveys.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8417616      PMCID: PMC1694528          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  Nonresponse and intensity of follow-up in an epidemiologic study of Vietnam-era veterans.

Authors:  P Decouflé; P Holmgreen; E E Calle; M F Weeks
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Use of telephone interviewing in health care research.

Authors:  C R Corey; H E Freeman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Evaluating health-care needs of the poor: a community-oriented approach.

Authors:  F A Hubbell; H Waitzkin; S I Mishra; J Dombrink
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods: mail, telephone and personal home interview.

Authors:  B I O'Toole; D Battistutta; A Long; K Crouch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Bias due to non-response in a Dutch survey on alcohol consumption.

Authors:  P H Lemmens; E S Tan; R A Knibbe
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1988-09

6.  Estimating odds ratios with categorically scaled covariates in multiple logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Response bias in the Honolulu Heart Program.

Authors:  R Benfante; D Reed; C MacLean; A Kagan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.897

  7 in total
  16 in total

1.  Are lower response rates hazardous to your health survey? An analysis of three state telephone health surveys.

Authors:  Michael Davern; Donna McAlpine; Timothy J Beebe; Jeanette Ziegenfuss; Todd Rockwood; Kathleen Thiede Call
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Effect on trend estimates of the difference between survey respondents and non-respondents: results from 27 populations in the WHO MONICA Project.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Annette Dobson; Sangita Kulathinal
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Patterns of unit and item nonresponse in the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Carol Edwards; January Angeles; Katrin Hambarsoomians; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors.

Authors:  Claudia R Baquet; Patricia Commiskey; C Daniel Mullins; Shiraz I Mishra
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2006-02-21

5.  Differing beliefs about breast cancer among Latinas and Anglo women.

Authors:  F A Hubbell; L R Chavez; S I Mishra; R B Valdez
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-05

6.  25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Satu Helakorpi; Kirsi Talala; Ville Helasoja; Tuija Martelin; Ritva Prättälä
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Non-participation and mortality in different socioeconomic groups: the FINRISK population surveys in 1972-92.

Authors:  Kennet Harald; Veikko Salomaa; Pekka Jousilahti; Seppo Koskinen; Erkki Vartiainen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings.

Authors:  M K Campbell; B M DeVellis; V J Strecher; A S Ammerman; R F DeVellis; R S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Risk factors for delayed immunization among children in an HMO.

Authors:  T A Lieu; S B Black; P Ray; M Chellino; H R Shinefield; N E Adler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Predictors of papanicolaou smear use among american samoan women.

Authors:  S I Mishra; P H Luce-Aoelua; F A Hubbell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.