Literature DB >> 1680369

Immunohistochemical and other features of breast carcinomas presenting clinically compared with those detected by cancer screening.

W K Cowan1, B Angus, J Henry, I P Corbett, W A Reid, C H Horne.   

Abstract

Features of 111 mammary carcinomas derived from breast cancer screening were compared with those of 69 carcinomas presenting 'clinically'. Screen detected cancers were smaller, had less likelihood of nodal metastases, included a higher proportion of in situ tumours and if invasive, tended to be of lower grade. Using immunohistochemical methods, the expression of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cathepsin D were compared in the two groups. A similar proportion of screened and unscreened tumours expressed c-erbB-2 oncoprotein and EGFR but expression of the oestrogen regulated protein cathepsin D was significantly more frequent in the screened group (P less than 0.05). Although a relatively small series, the results suggest a biological difference between 'screened' and 'clinical' tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1680369      PMCID: PMC1977686          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1991.398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  28 in total

1.  Neu-protein overexpression in breast cancer. Association with comedo-type ductal carcinoma in situ and limited prognostic value in stage II breast cancer.

Authors:  M J van de Vijver; J L Peterse; W J Mooi; P Wisman; J Lomans; O Dalesio; R Nusse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cathepsin D: an independent prognostic factor for metastasis of breast cancer.

Authors:  F Spyratos; T Maudelonde; J P Brouillet; M Brunet; A Defrenne; C Andrieu; K Hacene; A Desplaces; J Rouëssé; H Rochefort
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comparative study of the histopathology of breast cancer in a screened and unscreened population investigated by mammography.

Authors:  N M Gibbs
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Expression of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein: a prognostic indicator in human breast cancer.

Authors:  C Wright; B Angus; S Nicholson; J R Sainsbury; J Cairns; W J Gullick; P Kelly; A L Harris; C H Horne
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Comparative pathology of prevalent and incident cancers detected by breast screening. Edinburgh Breast Screening Project.

Authors:  T J Anderson; J Lamb; F Alexander; W Lutz; U Chetty; A P Forrest; A Kirkpatrick; B Muir; M M Roberts; A Huggins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene.

Authors:  D J Slamon; G M Clark; S G Wong; W J Levin; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Epidermal-growth-factor receptor status as predictor of early recurrence of and death from breast cancer.

Authors:  J R Sainsbury; J R Farndon; G K Needham; A J Malcolm; A L Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-06-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Relationships between oestrogen receptor,epidermal growth factor receptor, ER-D5, and P24 oestrogen regulated protein in human breast cancer.

Authors:  G M Horne; B Angus; C Wright; G Needham; S Nicholson; A L Harris; B Innes; C H Horne
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor as an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  J R Sainsbury; A J Malcolm; D R Appleton; J R Farndon; A L Harris
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Epidermal growth factor receptor status of histological sub-types of breast cancer.

Authors:  J R Sainsbury; S Nicholson; B Angus; J R Farndon; A J Malcolm; A L Harris
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hormone replacement therapy for all? Universal prescription is desirable.

Authors:  P Toozs-Hobson; L Cardozo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-10

2.  Prognostic value of cathepsin D in breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemical and immunoradiometric detection methods.

Authors:  U J Göhring; A Scharl; U Thelen; A Ahr; G Crombach; B R Titius
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The detection of ductal carcinoma in situ at mammographic screening enables the diagnosis of small, grade 3 invasive tumours.

Authors:  A J Evans; S E Pinder; D R Snead; A R Wilson; I O Ellis; C W Elston
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Pathological and biological features of mammographically detected invasive breast carcinomas.

Authors:  R Rajakariar; R A Walker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.