Literature DB >> 9052407

The detection of ductal carcinoma in situ at mammographic screening enables the diagnosis of small, grade 3 invasive tumours.

A J Evans1, S E Pinder, D R Snead, A R Wilson, I O Ellis, C W Elston.   

Abstract

This study was carried out to assess the frequency of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) occurring within and surrounding grade 3 invasive tumours and the effect of its detection on size and nodal stage of invasive carcinomas at mammographic detection. Grade 3 tumours with either no associated DCIS or DCIS only within the invasive component were significantly larger in size than tumours with surrounding DCIS (P < 0.02) and were less likely to be under or equal to 10 mm in size (0% or 13% vs 30% respectively, P < 0.02). Tumours with mammographic calcification were more likely to be less than or equal to 10 mm in size than non-calcific tumours (32% vs 11% respectively, P < 0.05). This was because of the high frequency of tumours less than or equal to 10 mm in size in the linear/branching calcification group. Tumours showing calcification without a mass also appear to be a group with good prognostic features, with a mean size of 13 mm, 33% being 10 mm or less in size and only 17% being node positive. We have found that the presence of surrounding DCIS enables earlier detection of grade 3 invasive carcinomas because of the presence of mammographically visible calcification. Detection of calcification suggestive of DCIS should remain an important part of mammographic screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9052407      PMCID: PMC2063314          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  15 in total

1.  Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insights from results of screening.

Authors:  L Tabár; G Fagerberg; N E Day; S W Duffy; R M Kitchin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: the relevance of histologic categorization.

Authors:  C O Bellamy; C McDonald; D M Salter; U Chetty; T J Anderson
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Implications from SEER data on breast cancer management.

Authors:  C R Smart; M H Myers; L A Gloeckler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  I O Ellis; M Galea; N Broughton; A Locker; R W Blamey; C W Elston
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Aggressiveness of breast cancers found with and without screening.

Authors:  P J Klemi; H Joensuu; S Toikkanen; J Tuominen; O Räsänen; J Tyrkkö; I Parvinen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-22

6.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings.

Authors:  A Evans; S Pinder; R Wilson; M Sibbering; D Poller; C Elston; I Ellis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Noninvasive breast carcinoma: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  D Rosner; R N Bedwani; J Vana; H W Baker; G P Murphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Evaluation of infiltrating ductal carcinomas with a DCIS component: correlation of the histologic type of the in situ component with grade of the infiltrating component.

Authors:  O T Lampejo; D M Barnes; P Smith; R R Millis
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  A J Evans; S Pinder; I O Ellis; M Sibbering; C W Elston; D N Poller; R Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Expression of the hypoxia-inducible and tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  C C Wykoff; N Beasley; P H Watson; L Campo; S K Chia; R English; J Pastorek; W S Sly; P Ratcliffe; A L Harris
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Microcalcification-Associated Breast Cancer: Presentation, Successful First Excision, Long-Term Recurrence and Survival Rate.

Authors:  Marga B Rominger; Carolin Steinmetz; Ronny Westerman; Annette Ramaswamy; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Force-dependent breaching of the basement membrane.

Authors:  Tammy T Chang; Dhruv Thakar; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 4.  Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: revisited.

Authors:  Catherine F Cowell; Britta Weigelt; Rita A Sakr; Charlotte K Y Ng; James Hicks; Tari A King; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Amanda Dibden; Dimitrios Michalopoulos; Judith Offman; Dharmishta Parmar; Jacquie Jenkins; Beverley Collins; Tony Robson; Suzanne Scorfield; Kathryn Green; Clare Hall; Xiao-Hui Liao; Michael Ryan; Fiona Johnson; Guy Stevens; Olive Kearins; Sarah Sellars; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 41.316

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.