Literature DB >> 16797923

Classification of adolescent psychotic disorders using linear discriminant analysis.

Patricia J Pardo1, Apostolos P Georgopoulos, John T Kenny, Traci A Stuve, Robert L Findling, S Charles Schulz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder during adolescence presents a major clinical problem. Can these two diagnoses be differentiated objectively early in the courses of illness?
METHODS: We used linear discrimination analysis (LDA) to classify 28 adolescent subjects into one of three diagnostic categories (healthy, N=8; schizophrenia, N=10; bipolar, N=10) using subsets from a pool of 45 variables as potential predictors (22 neuropsychological test scores and 23 quantitative structural brain measurements). The predictor variables were adjusted for age, gender, race, and psychotropic medication. All possible subsets composed of k=2-12 variables, from the set of 45 variables available, were evaluated using the robust leaving-one-subject-out method.
RESULTS: The highest correct classification (96%) of the 3 diagnostic categories was yielded by 9 sets of k=12 predictors, comprising both neuropsychological and brain structural measures. Although each one of these sets misclassified one case, each set correctly classified (100%) at least one group, such that a fully correct diagnosis could be reached by a tree-type decision procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that LDA with 12 predictor variables can provide correct and robust classification of subjects into the three diagnostic categories above. This robust classification relies upon both neuropsychological and brain structural information. Our results demonstrate that, despite overlapping clinical symptoms, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder can be differentiated early in the course of disease. This finding has two important implications. Firstly, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are different illnesses. If schizophrenia and bipolar are dissimilar clinical manifestations of the same disease, we would not be able to use non-clinical information to classify ('diagnose') schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Secondly, if this study's findings are replicated, brain structure (MRI) and brain function (neuropsychological) used together may be useful in the diagnosis of new patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16797923     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  16 in total

1.  Neurocognitive pattern analysis reveals classificatory hierarchy of attention deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Christina Shen; Florin C Popescu; Eric Hahn; Tam T M Ta; Michael Dettling; Andres H Neuhaus
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Single-subject classification of schizophrenia using event-related potentials obtained during auditory and visual oddball paradigms.

Authors:  Andres H Neuhaus; Florin C Popescu; John A Bates; Terry E Goldberg; Anil K Malhotra
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  A Review of Challenges in the Use of fMRI for Disease Classification / Characterization and A Projection Pursuit Application from Multi-site fMRI Schizophrenia Study.

Authors:  Oguz Demirci; Vincent P Clark; Vincent A Magnotta; Nancy C Andreasen; John Lauriello; Kent A Kiehl; Godfrey D Pearlson; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Neuropsychological testing and structural magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic biomarkers early in the course of schizophrenia and related psychoses.

Authors:  Elissaios Karageorgiou; S Charles Schulz; Randy L Gollub; Nancy C Andreasen; Beng-Choon Ho; John Lauriello; Vince D Calhoun; H Jeremy Bockholt; Scott R Sponheim; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2011-12

5.  Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients and healthy subjects by automated MRI measures of regional brain volume and cortical thickness.

Authors:  Yoichiro Takayanagi; Tsutomu Takahashi; Lina Orikabe; Yuriko Mozue; Yasuhiro Kawasaki; Kazue Nakamura; Yoko Sato; Masanari Itokawa; Hidenori Yamasue; Kiyoto Kasai; Masayoshi Kurachi; Yuji Okazaki; Michio Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Differentiation of schizophrenia patients from healthy subjects by mismatch negativity and neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Lin; Chih-Min Liu; Ming-Jang Chiu; Chen-Chung Liu; Yi-Ling Chien; Tzung-Jeng Hwang; Fu-Shan Jaw; Jia-Chi Shan; Ming H Hsieh; Hai-Gwo Hwu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Machine learning in major depression: From classification to treatment outcome prediction.

Authors:  Shuang Gao; Vince D Calhoun; Jing Sui
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 8.  Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mohammad R Arbabshirani; Sergey Plis; Jing Sui; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Towards a brain-based predictome of mental illness.

Authors:  Barnaly Rashid; Vince Calhoun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  A diagnostic model incorporating P50 sensory gating and neuropsychological tests for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jia-Chi Shan; Chih-Min Liu; Ming-Jang Chiu; Chen-Chung Liu; Yi-Ling Chien; Tzung-Jeng Hwang; Yi-Ting Lin; Ming H Hsieh; Fu-Shan Jaw; Hai-Gwo Hwu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.