Literature DB >> 16812695

Response deprivation, reinforcement, and economics.

James Allison.   

Abstract

Reinforcement of an instrumental response results not from a special kind of response consequence known as a reinforcer, but from a special kind of schedule known as a response-deprivation schedule. Under the requirements of a response-deprivation schedule, the baseline rate of the instrumental response permits less than the baseline rate of the contingent response. Because reinforcement occurs only if the schedule deprives the organism of the contingent response, reinforcement cannot result from any intrinsic property of the contingent response or any property relative to the instrumental response. Two typical effects of response-deprivation schedules-facilitation of the instrumental response and suppression of the contingent response-are discussed in terms of economic concepts and models of instrumental performance. It is suggested that response deprivation makes the contingent response function as an economic good, the instrumental response as currency.

Year:  1993        PMID: 16812695      PMCID: PMC1322150          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  Random and food-directed activity in hyperphagic and normal rats.

Authors:  P TEITELBAUM
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-10

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Paired baseline performance as a behavioral ideal.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contrast, induction, facilitation, suppression, and conservation.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis.

Authors:  D J Bernstein; E B Ebbesen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Efficiency and persistence of licking in rats.

Authors:  A Buxton; J Allison
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-02

7.  Schedule constraint on the average drink burst and the regulation of wheel running and drinking in rats.

Authors:  D J Gawley; W Timberlake; G A Lucas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1986-01

8.  The use of response deprivation to increase the academic performance of EMR students.

Authors:  E A Konarski; C R Crowell; L M Duggan
Journal:  Appl Res Ment Retard       Date:  1985

9.  Multidimensional aspects of drinking in the rat.

Authors:  J Allison; A Buxton
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-02

10.  Patch testing of coolant fractions.

Authors:  P Menter; W Harrison; W G Woodlin
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1975-09
View more
  14 in total

1.  The premack principle, response deprivation, and establishing operations.

Authors:  K P Klatt; E K Morris
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2001

Review 2.  The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Eric J Nunes; Patrick A Randall; Marta Pardo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  How research in behavioral pharmacology informs behavioral science.

Authors:  Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  R D Tustin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

5.  Applied implications of theory and research on the nature of reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

6.  Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Running and responding reinforced by the opportunity to run: effect of reinforcer duration.

Authors:  T W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A response-restriction analysis of stereotypy in adolescents with mental retardation: implications for applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  J E McEntee; R R Saunders
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

9.  A brief opportunity to run does not function as a reinforcer for mice selected for high daily wheel-running rates.

Authors:  Terry W Belke; Theodore Garland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Dopamine, behavioral economics, and effort.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Andrew M Farrar; Eric J Nunes; Marta Pardo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.