Literature DB >> 16795429

The comparative effectiveness of group and individually contingent free time with inner-city junior high school students.

J D Long1, R L Williams.   

Abstract

A major purpose of the study was to assess the relative effects of group versus individually contingent free time in modifying student behaviors. Other purposes were to determine the effectiveness of well-planned lesson activities and tokens without back-up reinforcers. Eight students in an inner-city seventh-grade class of 32 blacks served as subjects. Well-organized lesson activities and success feedback via tokens did not produce high levels of desirable behavior. In contrast, group and individually contingent free time produced substantially higher levels of appropriate behavior than did the baseline conditions. The group reinforcement procedure appeared to be slightly more effective than individual reinforcement.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16795429      PMCID: PMC1310859          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  5 in total

1.  Effects of group contingent events upon classroom noise.

Authors:  G W Schmidt; R E Ulrich
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

2.  Free-time as a reinforcer in the management of classroom behavior.

Authors:  J G Osborne
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

3.  Instructions and group versus individual reinforcement in modifying disruptive group behavior.

Authors:  S H Herman; J Tramontana
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1971

4.  The control of "classroom attention": a group contingency for complex behavior.

Authors:  R G Packard
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1970

5.  A tactic to eliminate disruptive behaviors in the classroom: group contingent consequences.

Authors:  S I Sulzbacher; J E Houser
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1968-07
  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Standardized classroom management program: Social validation and replication studies in Utah and Oregon.

Authors:  C R Greenwood; H Hops; H M Walker; J J Guild; J Stokes; K R Young; K S Keleman; M Willardson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1979

2.  Contingency contracting with disadvantaged youths: Improving classroom performance.

Authors:  M L Kelley; T F Stokes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1982

3.  Group contingencies for group consequences in classroom management: a further analysis.

Authors:  C R Greenwood; H Hops; J Delquadri; J Guild
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1974

4.  The analysis of group contingency data.

Authors:  J K Neumann
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

5.  The effects of individual and group consequences on school attendance and curfew violations with predelinquent adolescents.

Authors:  R N Alexander; T F Corbett; J Smigel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1976

6.  Interactions between teacher guidance and contingent access to play in developing preacademic skills of deviant preschool children.

Authors:  T G Rowbury; A M Baer; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1976

7.  A motivational environment for behaviorally deviant junior high school students.

Authors:  R C Heaton; D J Safer; R P Allen; N C Spinnato; F M Prumo
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1976

8.  The reduction of stealing in second graders using a group contingency.

Authors:  E B Switzer; T E Deal; J S Bailey
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

9.  Behavior change in children at a therapeutic summer camp as a function of feedback and individual versus group contingencies.

Authors:  H M Hughes
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1979-06

Review 10.  Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: an emerging technology.

Authors:  B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1987
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.