Literature DB >> 11989958

Users' understanding of medical knowledge in general practice.

Alison Chapple1, Stephen Campbell, Anne Rogers, Martin Roland.   

Abstract

Much emphasis is now being placed on the quality of medical care, and various ways are being developed to assess the medical knowledge of general practitioners. It is increasingly recognised that the users perspective on health care is important, and that the views of health care professionals do not and cannot represent patients' views. In order to explore whether or not a large-scale survey, which asked people to rate their doctors' medical knowledge, yielded meaningful results, this paper draws on findings from a study involving in-depth interviews with 26 lay people who had already completed the General Practice Assessment Survey questionnaire. When completing the questionnaires, patients had been asked to consider the 'technical care' provided by their general practitioners and to make a judgement about their doctors' medical knowledge. When interviewed at a later date, some people explained that they defined medical knowledge as knowledge of 'disease and treatments', while others defined it as knowledge of the 'whole person', and some defined a knowledgeable doctor as one who would acknowledge uncertainty. Patients appeared to have made judgements about their general practitioners' medical knowledge based on many factors, such as their experience of illness, perceptions of professional training, contact with other health care professionals in both primary and secondary care, and exposure to the media. The paper discusses the nature of medical knowledge, and concludes that although patient surveys are useful for the evaluation of interpersonal care and access to care, asking patients about their general practitioners' medical knowledge may yield invalid results. This is partly because patients defined medical knowledge in different ways, and partly because it appears that relatively few patients had enough knowledge about their own particular illnesses, or about possible alternative treatments, to make informed judgements about their general practitioners' medical knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11989958     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00091-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

1.  Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mala Rao; Aileen Clarke; Colin Sanderson; Richard Hammersley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-22

2.  Goals and Objectives to Optimize the Value of an Acute Pain Service in Perioperative Pain Management.

Authors:  Linda Le-Wendling; Wesley Glick; Patrick Tighe
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-12

3.  Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study.

Authors:  P Bower; S Campbell; C Bojke; B Sibbald
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-08

4.  What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities.

Authors:  Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Arne Risa Hole; Nicola Mead; Ruth McDonald; Diane Whalley; Peter Bower; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England.

Authors:  Martin Roland; Marc Elliott; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Josephine Barbiere; Richard A Parker; Patten Smith; Peter Bower; John Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-29

6.  The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  John Campbell; Patten Smith; Sonja Nissen; Peter Bower; Marc Elliott; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Relationship between clinical quality and patient experience: analysis of data from the english quality and outcomes framework and the National GP Patient Survey.

Authors:  Nadia R Llanwarne; Gary A Abel; Marc N Elliott; Charlotte A M Paddison; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; John L Campbell; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Identifying factors associated with experiences of coronary heart disease patients receiving structured chronic care and counselling in European primary care.

Authors:  Sabine Ludt; Jan van Lieshout; Stephen M Campbell; J Rochon; Dominik Ose; T Freund; Michel Wensing; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices.

Authors:  Nicola Mead; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-16

10.  Brief encounters: what do primary care professionals contribute to peoples' self-care support network for long-term conditions? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Anne Rogers; Ivaylo Vassilev; Helen Brooks; Anne Kennedy; Christian Blickem
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.