Literature DB >> 16793347

Diagnostic performance of primary 3-dimensional computed tomography colonography in the setting of colonic diverticular disease.

Matthew F Sanford1, Perry J Pickhardt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonic diverticular disease (CDD) is a leading cause of nondiagnostic segmental evaluation at computed tomography colonography (CTC). The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of CDD on polyp detection at primary 3-dimensional (3D) CTC.
METHODS: The study group consisted of 280 asymptomatic average-risk adults (mean age, 58.1 y; 167 men, 113 women). All patients underwent CTC followed by same-day optical colonoscopy with segmental unblinding (reference standard). Primary 3D endoluminal evaluation with 2-dimensional correlation was used for initial polyp detection at CTC. Without knowledge of polyp findings, all colonic segments were reviewed for the presence of CDD and graded as absent, minimal, moderate, or extensive disease.
RESULTS: Moderate or extensive CDD was present in 271 (12.1%) of 2240 colonic segments and 142 (50.7%) of 280 patients. CTC performance for polyps 6 mm or larger in the presence and absence of moderate-extensive CDD was as follows: by-segment sensitivity of 90.3% (28/31) and 79.4% (123/155); by-patient sensitivity of 86.5% (64/74) and 83.1% (54/65); by-segment specificity of 97.1% (233/240) and 97.7% (1772/1814); by-patient specificity of 83.8% (57/68) and 83.6% (61/73); by-segment positive predictive value of 80.0% (28/35) and 74.5% (123/165); by-patient positive predictive value of 85.3% (64/75) and 81.8% (64/66); by-segment negative predictive value of 98.7% (233/236) and 98.2% (1172/1804); and by-patient negative predictive value of 85.1% (57/67) and 84.7% (61/72), respectively (not significant, P > or = .15).
CONCLUSIONS: CDD was common in this asymptomatic screening population, but its presence did not degrade the diagnostic performance of primary 3D CTC for polyp detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16793347     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  8 in total

1.  Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography.

Authors:  Christopher M Buchach; David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  Missed lesions at CT colonography: lessons learned.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2013-02

Review 3.  Computed tomographic colonography: hope or hype?

Authors:  Otto Schiueh-Tzang Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Diverticular disease severity score based on CT colonography.

Authors:  Nicola Flor; Paolo Rigamonti; Andrea Pisani Ceretti; Solange Romagnoli; Federica Balestra; Francesco Sardanelli; Gianpaolo Cornalba; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  CT colonography: pitfalls in interpretation.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 7.  Paradigm shift: the Copernican revolution in diverticular disease.

Authors:  Angelo Zullo; Luigi Gatta; Roberto Vassallo; Vincenzo De Francesco; Raffaele Manta; Fabio Monica; Giulia Fiorini; Dino Vaira
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-02

8.  CT colonography followed by elective surgery in patients with acute diverticulitis: a radiological-pathological correlation study.

Authors:  Nicola Flor; Perry J Pickhardt; Giovanni Maconi; Silvia Panella; Monica Falleni; Valeria Merlo; Giovanni Di Leo
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.