Literature DB >> 23182508

CT colonography: pitfalls in interpretation.

Perry J Pickhardt1, David H Kim.   

Abstract

As with any radiologic imaging test, there are several potential interpretive pitfalls at CT colonography that need to be recognized and handled appropriately. Perhaps the single most important step in learning to avoid most of these diagnostic traps is simply to be aware of their existence. With a little experience, most of these potential pitfalls are easily recognized. This article systematically covers the key pitfalls confronting the radiologist at CT colonography interpretation, primarily dividing them into those related to technique and those related to underlying anatomy. Tips and pointers for how to effectively handle these potential pitfalls are included.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23182508      PMCID: PMC3508474          DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  52 in total

1.  Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.

Authors:  Srinath C Yeshwant; Ronald M Summers; Jianhua Yao; Daniel S Brickman; J Richard Choi; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Extracolonic tumors of the gastrointestinal tract detected incidentally at screening CT colonography.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Andrew J Taylor; Deepak V Gopal; Sharon M Weber; Charles P Heise
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Spectrum of normal findings, anatomic variants and pathology of ileocecal valve: CT colonography appearances and endoscopic correlation.

Authors:  Franco Iafrate; Marco Rengo; Riccardo Ferrari; Pasquale Paolantonio; Michela Celestre; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

4.  Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Andrew D Lee; Andrew J Taylor; Steven J Michel; Thomas C Winter; Anthony Shadid; Ryan J Meiners; Peter J Chase; J Louis Hinshaw; John G Williams; Tyler M Prout; S Hamid Husain; David H Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Colonic preparation for computed tomographic colonography: understanding the relative advantages and disadvantages of a noncathartic approach.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Screening CT colonography: how I do it.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Eugene K Choi; Seung Soo Lee; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Ji-Yun Jo; Young Hoon Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Hyun Kwon Ha; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Evaluation of submucosal lesions of the large intestine: part 1. Neoplasms.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Christine O Menias; Deepak V Gopal; Glen M Arluk; Charles P Heise
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  Evaluation of submucosal lesions of the large intestine: part 2. Nonneoplastic causes.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Christine O Menias; Deepak V Gopal; Glen M Arluk; Charles P Heise
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.

Authors:  David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt; Andrew J Taylor; Winifred K Leung; Thomas C Winter; J Louis Hinshaw; Deepak V Gopal; Mark Reichelderfer; Richard H Hsu; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in colorectal imaging.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.287

2.  Carpet lesions detected at CT colonography: clinical, imaging, and pathologic features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Vu P Lam; Jennifer M Weiss; Gregory D Kennedy; David H Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Intra-individual comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for bowel preparation at CT colonography: automated volumetric analysis of residual fluid for quality assessment.

Authors:  P Bannas; J Bakke; A Munoz del Rio; P J Pickhardt
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Joshua Bakke; Jarret Kuo; Jessica B Robbins; Meghan G Lubner; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; David H Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Automated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography.

Authors:  Peter Bannas; Joshua Bakke; James L Patrick; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-01

7.  CT colonography has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Lukas Lambert; Jiri Jahoda; Gabriela Grusova; Pavel Hrabak; Ales Novotny; Andrea Burgetova
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination.

Authors:  Jake Theis; David H Kim; Meghan G Lubner; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-01

9.  Computed Tomography Colonography Phantom: Construction, Validation and Literature Review.

Authors:  Lukas Lambert; Alena Lambertova; Jan Danes; Gabriela Grusova
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 0.212

10.  Sub-milliSievert ultralow-dose CT colonography with iterative model reconstruction technique.

Authors:  Lukas Lambert; Petr Ourednicek; Jan Briza; Walter Giepmans; Jiri Jahoda; Lukas Hruska; Jan Danes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.